Comparison Test: Inexpensive Family Sedans
 

Introduction
Vehicle Details

25th Place

24th Place

23rd Place

22nd Place

21st Place

20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place

Evaluations
 

 

9th Place: Chevrolet Impala

The Impala was updated and vastly improved for the 2006 model year. While in previous years it was nothing more than big and cheap, the seats are now comfortable, the interior is of good quality, and ride, handling, and acceleration are all improved without changing the car’s basic success formula. The Impala isn’t as refined as some competing models, the rear seat isn’t as roomy, and it’s not as agile, but it is still a very good large family car for a reasonable price.

 

The Impala has a soft, comfortable, and absorbent ride, though it is prone to some highway-speed float. It isn’t nearly as agile as some competitors, but handles well enough. The steering is more responsive and better-weighted than in last year’s Impala. The standard 3.5-liter V6 performs better than the base engine it just replaced, particularly off the line, but there is still no excess passing power. The car remains quiet except under acceleration, when the engine’s rough growl becomes somewhat intrusive. Fuel economy is reasonable for a V6 car in this group.

 

Inside, the Impala’s standard front bench seat is a bit soft, and too low, but reasonably comfortable. Don’t expect to fit a passenger in the middle seating position though. There is plenty of leg and head space. The rear is well-shaped and comfortable, though the car has surprisingly little head and leg space for rear-seat occupants considering its exterior size. Interior quality was vastly improved in the redesign, though this base Impala has a few cheap plastics, panel fit and overall materials quality are finally competitive. The gauges are clear, and the instruments are large, well-placed, and easy to use. Drivers sit low, but comfortably enough, and have good visibility. Entry/exit is easy to the front, but the shape of the roof and the narrower footwells complicate rear seat access. The trunk is very large and well-shaped.

 

The Impala did very well in NHTSA crash testing. It earned five stars for both the driver and for the front passenger in the frontal crash test, and five stars for the driver and four for the rear passenger in the side crash test. The IIHS has not tested the Impala since its update, and hasn’t subjected any version to their side crash test.

 

The Impala reviewed here came in adequately equipped at $20,262. At that price, it includes the standard curtain-style head-protecting side airbags, power driver’s seat, and OnStar accident notification system, as well as the optional antilock brakes with traction control and a remote starting system. Most other items are available on higher trims, but stability control and torso-protecting side airbags are not.

 

Overall, the Impala is comfortable, safe, and reasonably priced. It doesn’t really do anything exceptionally, but does most things well. It is a decent large sedan for a decent price, the basic combination that has made it GM’s best-selling passenger car, and is worth a look with its 2006 improvements.

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Chevrolet Impala

 LS

 3.5-liter V6 (201 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $20,262

 

  Pros:

-Trunk Space

-Safety Ratings

-Ride Comfort

-Acceleration

-Ergonomics

 

 Cons:

-Agility

-Low Seats

 

Overall:

GM’s basic large-midsize sedan formula continues with an overhaul of the specifics.

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2005, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research