Comparison Test: Compact Wagons  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

12th Place: Dodge Caliber

 

The Caliber is new for the 2007 model year, a hatchback-only replacement for the Dodge Neon sedan. Considering that it is the first all-new Chrysler small car in seven years, and that it was designed as a hatchback instead of simply having some extra practicality tacked on, one would have expected something that would be a better car than the competitors that have been around for years. It didn’t happen. Visibility and cargo space have been sacrificed for styling, power, agility, and fuel economy have fallen victim to excessive weight, and the car is neither especially smooth-riding nor quiet. And while it hasn’t placed where it was because of a bloated price tag as many all-new designs might (which would have been more justifiable and easier to amend), it’s not especially inexpensive either. Maybe for the 2014 model year Chrysler will put a bit more effort into giving a new small car as much substance as style.

 

The Caliber, like the Suzuki Reno, rides comfortably enough on smooth pavement, but ride comfort and control diminish on less-ideal surfaces. It does generally absorb small bumps well, but pounds over larger ones. It doesn’t handle well either, probably a victim of its excessive mass. Body roll is excessive, and the steering is neither responsive nor communicative; the Caliber generally feels like a larger vehicle in cornering. The 2.0-liter I4’s 158 horsepower looks good on paper, but makes the Caliber neither quick nor quiet. Wind and road noise are also excessive. Fuel economy at least is decent by this group’s standards.

 

Inside, the Caliber features plenty of passenger space, though the front and rear seats could be better-shaped and better-padded. The rear seatbacks can recline a few degrees on all but the base version, but the standard setting is the most comfortable anyway. The interior is constructed primarily of flimsy plastic trim pieces that don’t always fit together well. The gauges are clear enough, but some instruments are too small, too low, and complicated to use. Drivers sit comfortably, but a high beltline and thick roof pillars obstruct forward and rearward visibility. There isn’t as much cargo space in most of the others in this group, and more of the available space is in height rather than floor space. The cargo area is coated in hard plastic for easy washing, but unlike in the Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe and Chevrolet HHR, the rear seatbacks are not of the same material.

 

The Caliber earned five stars for both the driver and for the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, but has yet to be subjected to any other crash tests.

 

The Caliber reviewed here came in well-equipped at $16,788, a reasonable price by this group’s standards. Torso-protecting side airbags are not offered, but it does include a driver-side knee-protecting airbag, a fold-flat front passenger’s seat, and an air-conditioned glovebox.

 

Overall, like the Suzuki Reno, the Caliber can make a good first impression for its reasonable price and interior space. But compared to the competition, it comes up short in terms of cargo volume, seat shape, ride comfort, handling, refinement, and acceleration. It’s not so inexpensive that those flaws can be excused, and others here have the same strengths. When the appeal of the new styling wears off, Chrysler will have to weather seven years with a mediocre small car or try again.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2007 Dodge Caliber

 SXT

 2.0-liter I4 (158 hp)

 CVT

 $16,788

 

  Pros:

-Price

-Fuel Economy

-Passenger Space

 

 Cons:

-Cargo Space

-Handling

-Ride Comfort

-Refinement

-Acceleration

-Visibility

 

 Overall:

While the Caliber has its strong points, it falls short of some very similar competitors.            

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2006, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research