Comparison Test: Economy Sedans  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

16th Place: Suzuki Forenza

 

The Forenza manages a good first impression. It has clean styling inside and out, decent interior space, and a reasonable price. However, its strong points are mitigated by a lengthy roster of inadequacies. The car is neither quick nor fuel efficient, and neither comfortable-riding nor agile. And while its pricing is reasonable, it’s not less expensive than a number of much better cars.  

 

The Forenza rides comfortably enough over smooth pavement, but anything else will reveal its lack of composure; it is jittery over smaller road imperfections, it slams over larger ones, and recovers slowly. And it feels particularly ungainly, with excessive body roll and numb, slow steering, the worst of any current small car. The 2.0-liter 4-cylinder returns an even more disappointing combination of poor acceleration and the poor gas mileage of the group, and it is rough and noisy while doing this. Road noise is noticeable as well.

 

Inside, the Forenza’s front seats are too low, but comfortable and supportive overall, and there is decent space. The rear seat could also be higher, the cushion is flat, and legroom is deficient for larger occupants. However, adults do fit, which is more than can be said about too many of the others here. The interior is surprisingly well-constructed, one of the car’s few strong points. The dash design is tasteful, and it makes use of high quality materials that fit together quite well, though a few of the plastics look a lot better than they feel. The instruments are conveniently placed, and the gauges are large and clear. Drivers sit comfortably, though a bit too low. The rear head restraints partially obstruct the rearward view, but visibility is good overall. The door openings are a bit narrow, and the seats a bit low, but the well-shaped roofline contributes to generally easy entry/exit. The trunk is reasonably sized, and conveniently shaped.

 

The Forenza is marketed as an inexpensive alternative to the class leaders, but it only undercuts the best-selling Toyota Corolla by a few hundred dollars at $15,409, coming out more expensive than many superior competitors. At that price, it includes a now-rare cassette/CD combination and a tire-pressure monitor, but curtain-style head-protecting side airbags and traction control aren’t offered.

 

Overall, the Forenza disappoints in the most basic ways while bringing in oddly devoted attention to detail in others. This helps the car look good at first glance, but it is clearly mediocre or worse under any subsequent evaluation, and without a sufficient price advantage to come close to compensating for that.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2007 Suzuki Forenza Convenience

 2.0-liter I4 (126 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $15,409

 

  Pros:

-Interior Space

-Interior Quality

-Price

 

 Cons:

-Ride

-Handling

-Acceleration

-Fuel Economy

-Refinement

-Safety Ratings

 

 Overall: 4/10

Skin-deep competence.

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2007, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research