Comparison Test: Midsize SUVs
 
Introduction
Vehicle Details
20th Place
19th Place
18th Place
17th Place

16th Place

15th Place

14th Place

13th Place

12th Place

11th Place

10th Place

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations

 

 

3rd Place: Honda Pilot

The Pilot is a very good all-around SUV: very good in most ways. And when it was introduced in 2003, that was enough for it to be best-in-class. Since then, new competitors have been introduced, and old competitors have been upgraded. So while the Pilot remains a strong, very well-rounded contender, it has been surpassed by some vehicles that do the same things better, and/or for less money. It doesn’t have any unique strong points, but its combination of excellent (if not class-leading) traits brought it to a respectable 3rd place.

 

The Pilot rides comfortably, absorbing most road imperfections very well. The soft ride can get a bit floaty at high speeds, however. The tradeoff for the ride softness comes in handling, while the Pilot is safe and secure, it is far from agile, and has noticeable body roll, especially in fast cornering. The 3.5-liter V6 makes it reasonably quick and never feels overworked, though the Pilot's additional mass compared to a few competitors keeps its acceleration midpack overall. The engine is smooth and quiet, even under hard acceleration. Wind noise is well-suppressed, but road noise is audible. Fuel economy is good by this group's standards.

 

Inside, the high front seats are comfortable, but the cushion is a bit flat and could be longer. The roomy rear seat is better-shaped, though a bit firm. The third row is roomy for a midsize SUV's, but low and hard, and still far from even adequately spacious for adult occupants. The dash uses high-quality materials that fit together very well, but lacks the luxury look and feel that has come to be expected in this price range. The instruments are well-placed and well- marked, but a few buttons could be larger. The gauges are very large and clear. The driver sits high and comfortably, and has very good visibility, thanks to the large windows and fairly thin roof pillars. Entry/exit is very easy despite a fairly high ride height, and even third-row access is possible (if not optimally simple) for adults. There is enough room for groceries behind the third row, but not too much else. Cargo space is impressive overall, and the cargo area is well-shaped.

 

The Pilot did very well in crash testing, earning five stars for both the driver and the front passenger in the NHTSA frontal crash test, as well as five stars for both the driver and the rear passenger in the NHTSA side crash test, with the standard side airbags. NHTSA also estimated a 15% chance of rollover in a single vehicle accident, good for a four-star rating. The IIHS rated the Pilot Best Pick in its offset crash test, but has not evaluated its head restraints.

 

The Pilot reviewed here came in at $30,295, fairly well-equipped. It includes standard traction and stability control, side airbags that protect the heads of occupants in all three rows of seats, a 6-disc CD player, a power driver's seat, and automatic climate control, but not much else. A sunroof, a power passenger seat, seat heaters, and leather are among the options available only on pricier versions of the car.

 

Overall, while the Pilot does not stand out in any one area, it offers a blend of excellence in areas of safety, comfort, refinement, and interior room. A few competitors offer comparable blends however, and some have their own trump cards. But the Pilot remains an excellent choice in this group, falling short in no significant way but the cost of that achievement. It may no longer be the clear best choice in this class, but it definitely is still worth a look from midsize SUV shoppers.

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2006 Honda Pilot

 EX

 3.5-liter I5 (244 hp)

 5-speed automatic

 $30,295

 

  Pros:

-Interior Space

-Interior Comfort

-Ride Comfort

-Safety Ratings

-Fuel Economy

-Interior Quality

 

 Cons:

-Features for the Money

 

 Overall:

Very good in most ways, yet outstanding in none.

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2005, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research