Comparison Test: Subcompact Wagons  
 

Introduction

Vehicle Details

9th Place

8th Place

7th Place

6th Place

5th Place

4th Place

3rd Place

2nd Place

1st Place
Evaluations


 

 

2nd Place: Ford Focus ZX5

 

The Focus is one of the larger vehicles in this group, but also one of the least expensive. With an excellent ride/handling balance and well-shaped seats, it blends comfort and driving enjoyment extremely well. It also has more power than most of the others here. Without doubt, it offers the most car for the money in this group. However, that amount of car and the relatively large engine cut into gas mileage, which, while acceptable, is lower than most of the others here. Toss in somewhat high noise levels and unfortunate interior quality, and it isn’t the best all-around subcompact.

 

The Focus has a firm and controlled but very comfortable ride. It absorbs bumps well and recovers quickly. It is also the most fun to drive car in this group, with the quickest, sharpest, best-feeling steering and an agile feel. It is also quicker than all of the others in the group except for the gas-guzzling VW Rabbit, and is rare in this group in being able to summon extra power at highway speeds. The engine can get noisy under acceleration though, and wind and road noise could be better-suppressed. As noted, gas mileage doesn’t impress by the standards of this group.

 

Inside, the Focus has large, high, well-shaped, and well-padded front seats with excellent leg and head space and impressive lateral support. The rear seat doesn’t have as much legroom even as some of the smaller cars in this group, but the high seat cushion and the abundant foot space beneath the front seats contribute to making it one of the group’s most comfortable. Interior quality is lacking even at this price point; too many trim pieces feel cheap, and they are indifferently assembled and often oddly matched. Drivers are treated to a tilt/telescope steering wheel, which helps them find a very comfortable driving position. Rearward visibility could be better, however. Entry/exit is very easy to the front, and simple enough to the rear. There is more usable cargo space behind the rear seat than in most of the others here, but the rear seat can only fold to an angle or be tumbled forward in a two-step process.

 

The Focus reviewed here came in at $14,785, less expensive than any of the others but the Rio and Aveo. It doesn’t offer curtain-style side airbags, but includes the other expected features in this group, and was one of only three with traction control.

 

Overall, the Focus ZX5 is practical, comfortable, fun to drive, and very inexpensive. Also for about $1,000 more (still well within the range of this group) you can get the larger ZXW wagon version, which offers much more cargo space and a roomier rear seat without deficit. But without better gas mileage, the Focus can’t be considered the best subcompact, and interior improvements and additional noise suppression would also be welcome.

 

NEXT PAGE

 

 

The Basics:

 

 Vehicle Reviewed:

 2007 Ford Focus ZX5

 SE

 2.0-liter I4 (136 hp)

 4-speed automatic

 $14,785

 

  Pros:

-Price

-Interior Comfort

-Ride Comfort

-Agility

-Acceleration

 

 Cons:

-Fuel Economy

-Interior Quality

 

 Overall: 7/10

An excellent little car that would need better gas mileage to win this comparison.

 

 

  

IFCAR Home

Reviews

Pricing

Other Sources

Top Picks

Vehicle Info

About IFCAR

Contact IFCAR

© 2006, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research