|
Get
email updates from IFCAR.
Jeep
Reviews
Impressions and critiques of
Jeep products. Recommended vehicles are printed in
blue in the list of models, any
model shown in bold blue
was judged to be the best vehicle in its class.
(Model names printed with the reviews will not be colored
whether a vehicle is recommended or not.) See
all Top Picks and Recommended models by class.
|
Jeep Commander

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $29,255-$35,225
Pros:
Ride, price, towing capacity, warranty,
acceleration (5.7-liter).
Cons:
Fuel economy, acceleration (V6),
refinement (V6), cargo space, third-row-seat
space, visibility.
Overall: Not outstandingly capable on or off
the road, but adequate in either situation.
Rating:
6/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Practicality |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
2/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
7/10 |
5/10 |
|
The
Commander is a reshaped and expanded version of
Jeep's more popular Grand Cherokee model that
squeezes in a third-row-seat to match the
competition. While it isn't nearly as space
efficient as many competitors, it allows for
four passengers to sit in much more comfort than
in the smaller Grand Cherokee, and can fit two
more children. Like the Grand Cherokee, the
Commander rides and handles well for a
truck-based SUV, but lacks steering feel. A weak
and noisy 3.7-liter V6 is standard, and an
adequately powerful and quiet 4.7-liter V8 and a
smooth and a strong 5.7-liter V8 are optional,
but none of the three are fuel-efficient.
Visibility is poor in all directions, despite
the boxy shape, because of thick roof pillars
and a high beltline. The Commander is a decent
choice for consumers who must have a high towing
capacity or good off-road ability, but its
space, comfort, and refinement are not
comparable to a good car-based competitor's.
If you don't need
towing and off-road capabilities, consider the
GMC Acadia and
Saturn Outlook twins, which are spacious,
comfortable, and refined. Another
excellent midsize SUV to consider is the Ford
Taurus X, which is quiet but otherwise
un-luxurious, but is well-priced, comfortable,
safe, and spacious, though it doesn't have quite
as much cargo space as the Acadia. The Hyundai Veracruz has a luxurious interior and a very
quiet ride, and is roomy and comfortable, but
isn't as agile or spacious as the Acadia, and
lacks a price advantage. The Honda Pilot is a
roomy, somewhat utilitarian SUV that lacks the
Acadia's luxury but is all-around competent. The
Mazda CX-9 is the class leader for consumers
interested in nimble handling, and the Chrysler
Pacifica is a good value alternative, but
neither are as roomy as the Acadia. And, for
those willing to consider them, minivans are
excellent alternatives to FWD car-based midsize
SUVs. If towing or off-road ability is a must,
consider the Ford Explorer and Nissan
Pathfinder. The Explorer is more spacious,
refined, and comfortable than either the
Pathfinder or the Commander, but the other two
are more powerful. The Pathfinder handles better
and gets better gas mileage, but isn't as roomy.
For even more space, consider larger SUVs like the Dodge Durango
(which is mechanically related to the Commander
but much roomier) and the Ford
Expedition.
See all Midsize SUVs
|
|
|
|
Jeep Compass

Available As: Small SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $15,425-$21,675
Pros:
Price, fuel economy, ride.
Cons:
Interior comfort, interior quality,
acceleration, towing capacity, refinement,
visibility.
Overall: Not good enough to be a good small
SUV and not cheap enough to be a good station
wagon, the Compass is a wannabe that doesn't
know what it wants to be.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Small SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
3/10 |
2/10 |
|
Practicality |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
4/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
8/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
10/10 |
7/10 |
|
The
Compass is closer to just a compact wagon even
than its car-based competitors, as it is only a
restyled version of the Dodge Caliber, which is
almost inarguably an economy car. So while it
has a price advantage compared to competitors
that are more like SUVs, it doesn't compare
favorably with economy cars, including the
Caliber. And like the Caliber, it is a decidedly
inferior vehicle, with a low quality interior,
uncomfortable seats, weak and noisy engines, and
mediocre handling. (Handling and fuel economy
compare well to many SUVs simply because the car
is so small, but compare terribly to comparable
economy cars.) The Compass may seem like a good
deal, for a reasonably spacious interior and an
SUV appearance starting under $16,000, but it's
neither the steal it seems nor a competitive
product. There are better choices.
If you are
cross-shopping the Compass with practical cars
that don't pretend to be SUVs, consider the Kia
Rondo and Mazda5, which are small, tall station
wagons that offer much more passenger space and
comfort, interior quality, refinement, and
agility. The Scion xB is roomy for five
passengers, rides well, and is quiet, but
doesn't have a particularly well laid-out or
high-quality interior. For better gas mileage,
consider the Toyota Matrix and Pontiac Vibe
twins, though they are rather noisy and slow. If
you want all-wheel-drive in your
hatchback/wagon, your choices are limited to the
undersized Suzuki SX4 or the pricier Subaru
Impreza that isn't significantly larger inside,
but either is a better choice than the Compass.
If you want a roomier AWD vehicle, or if you
must have an SUV, some good bargains include the
Ford Escape and Hyundai Tucson / Kia Sportage
twins. For a bit more money, the Toyota RAV4,
Honda CR-V, and Subaru Forester are excellent
choices.
See all Small SUVs
|
|
|
|
Jeep Grand
Cherokee

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $27,665-$40,105
Pros:
Acceleration (5.7-liter), ride, handling,
towing capacity.
Cons:
Interior space, fuel economy, visibility,
interior quality, refinement (V6), acceleration
(V6.)
Overall: With a well-designed interior, it
could have been one of the best truck-based
midsize SUVs. Without it, it isn't.
Rating:
5/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Practicality |
3/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
2/10 |
|
Safety |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
4/10 |
|
The
Grand Cherokee is available with a smooth,
strong 5.7-liter V8, rides and handles well for
a truck-based SUV, and seems to do better
off-road even than many other truck-based
competitors. But its shortcomings make it a poor
choice in its class, shortcomings that are
mostly found inside. The front seats lack head
room, the low rear seat is uncomfortable and
lacks leg room, there is no available third-row
seat, and cargo space and access is compromised
by the high load floor. The interior is also
shoddily assembled with too many cheap plastics.
Furthermore, the base V6 engine is weak and
noisy, the midline 4.7-liter V8 isn't as strong
as many competitors', and none of the three
engines gets good gas mileage. The Grand
Cherokee has its strong points, but then too
many negatives.
Two better choices
than the Grand Cherokee are the mechanically
related Dodge Durango and Jeep Commander. Both
offer comfortable seating for four passengers
(the Durango goes further with space for eight
to sit in comfort) and share the Grand
Cherokee's strong points, but also suffer from
mediocre interior quality, poor gas mileage, and
weak base engines, and are larger and more
expensive. If you want something the size of the
Grand Cherokee and need to tow or go off-road,
consider the Ford Explorer and Nissan
Pathfinder. The Pathfinder is more powerful and
agile, and the Explorer is more spacious and
quieter. For on-road use and no need for a
third-row, consider the Nissan Murano and
Mitsubishi Endeavor, which offer comfort for
five passengers and good acceleration and
handling. And for more space at around the same
price, consider the Chrysler Pacifica and Ford
Taurus X, which are spacious, safe, comfortable,
and quiet.
See all Midsize SUVs
|
|
|
|
Jeep Liberty

Available As: Small SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $20,330-$26,125
Pros:
Interior space, off-road ability.
Cons:
Ride, handling, refinement, interior
quality, fuel economy, visibility.
Overall: Better off than on the road, and a
poor choice for on-road users.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to
Small SUVs |
Compared to
All Vehicles |
|
Seat Comfort |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
4/10 |
3/10 |
|
Practicality |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Performance |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Fuel Economy |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
5/10 |
7/10 |
|
The
Liberty was redesigned for 2008, but did not
improve enough to be one of the best small SUVs,
particularly in the daily on-road driving most
SUVs are used for. Retaining its truck-type
architecture, it rides and handles poorly
compared to many competitors, and its higher
weight also hurts acceleration and fuel economy.
The interior is cheaply made as well, though
better than other new Jeeps and the Liberty's
Dodge Nitro twin. But the Liberty does have more
off-road capability than most competitors,
useful if you are among the few small SUV-buyers
who need more than the modest capability offered
in even the most carlike SUV. But for the
mainstream market, the Liberty lacks the
comfort, refinement, and fuel economy that have
become much more common in this class.
If
you're looking for a small SUV that won't go
off-road or tow, the
Honda CR-V, Nissan Rogue,
Subaru Forester, and
Toyota RAV4 are
well-rounded choices. The Ford Escape is roomy
and inexpensive, but somewhat unrefined. The
Hyundai Tucson
/ Kia Sportage
twins are excellent values, but not particularly
spacious, powerful, or fuel-efficient. The
Hyundai Santa Fe
is roomy and luxurious, but can be surprisingly
expensive. Off-road users should look at the
Nissan Xterra,
and the most adventurous off-road users should
consider the Jeep
Wrangler.
See all Small SUVs
|
|
|
|
Jeep Patriot

Available As: Small SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $14,425-$21,175
Pros:
Price, fuel economy, ride.
Cons:
Interior comfort, interior quality,
acceleration, towing capacity, refinement.
Overall: Not good enough to be a good small
SUV and not cheap enough to be a good station
wagon, the Patriot is a wannabe that doesn't
know what it wants to be.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Small SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
3/10 |
2/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
4/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
8/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
10/10 |
7/10 |
|
Although the boxy
Patriot shares little resemblance with Jeep's
swoopier Compass, the two share everything else.
They cost almost exactly the same when
comparably equipped, and have the same platform,
interior, and engines. This is a bad thing, for
the Compass (and the less-identical but also
closely related Dodge Caliber) is an inferior
vehicle with a low quality interior,
uncomfortable seats, weak and noisy engines, and
mediocre handling. (Handling and fuel economy
compare well to many SUVs simply because the car
is so small, but compare terribly to comparable
economy cars.) The Patriot may seem like a good
deal, for a reasonably spacious interior and an
SUV appearance starting under $16,000, but it's
neither the steal it seems nor a competitive
product. Its boxy shape gives it slightly better
cargo space and slightly better visibility than
the Compass, and Jeep claims it does better off
road, but there are better choices than either.
If you are
cross-shopping the Patriot with practical cars
that don't pretend to be SUVs, consider the Kia
Rondo and Mazda5, which are small, tall station
wagons that offer much more passenger space and
comfort, interior quality, refinement, and
agility. The Scion xB is roomy for five
passengers, rides well, and is quiet, but
doesn't have a particularly well laid-out or
high-quality interior. For better gas mileage,
consider the Toyota Matrix and Pontiac Vibe
twins, though they are rather noisy and slow. If
you want all-wheel-drive in your
hatchback/wagon, your choices are limited to the
undersized Suzuki SX4 or the pricier Subaru
Impreza that isn't significantly larger inside,
but either is a better choice than the Patriot.
If you want a roomier AWD vehicle, or if you
must have an SUV, some good bargains include the
Ford Escape and Hyundai Tucson / Kia Sportage
twins. For a bit more money, the Toyota RAV4,
Honda CR-V, and Subaru Forester are excellent
choices.
See all Small SUVs
|
|
|
|
Jeep Wrangler

Available As: Small SUV with two or four
doors
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $37,685-$50,185
Pros:
Off-road ability, cargo space (Unlimited),
removable roof.
Cons:
On-road ability, price, interior quality,
cargo space (2-door), rear-seat comfort.
Overall: If you're looking for the best new
off-road vehicle, you don't need a review to
know it's the Wrangler. But only then should you
consider it.
Rating:
3/10
Recommended: For off-road use only
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to
Small SUVs |
Compared to
All Vehicles |
|
Seat Comfort |
4/10 |
4/10 |
|
Luxury |
3/10 |
2/10 |
|
Practicality |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
3/10 |
3/10 |
|
Fuel Economy |
3/10 |
3/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
The
redesigned-for-2007 Wrangler has been widely
acknowledged as the most civilized Wrangler yet.
This is true. However, this leads to the
misconception that it is civilized by the
standards of any other small SUV. While the
Wrangler remains the top choice for the most
challenging off-road conditions (at least, among
stock new vehicles) sacrifices still must be
made to get it to that position. It still
bounces and slams its way over bumps
(particularly in the two-door version), and
fights against attempts to change its direction.
The new V6 engine, like the old one, is noisy,
thirsty, and slow. And wind noise remains
excessive. Also, there continue to be problems
that are not legitimate tradeoffs for off-road
ability. Such as the "rugged" interior, which is
the nice way of describing cheap, flimsy
plastic. Or such as the insubstantial front
seats, and the low, uncomfortable rear seats. In
case the message did not make it across, the
Wrangler is not an alternative to car-based
"cute utes" for daily use, so do not consider
buying one for that purpose. "The most civilized
Wrangler" is still relative.
For a better blend
of off-road ability and everyday livability,
consider the Nissan Xterra. It doesn't ride
comfortably, but has a stronger, smoother engine
with better manual shift quality than the
Wrangler, a more comfortable and higher-quality
interior, much better handling, and less wind
noise. It's still not ideal for commuting, but
it's much closer than the Wrangler. For an
on-road-only SUV, consider such well-rounded
car-based models as the Ford Escape, Honda CR-V,
Hyundai Tuscon / Kia Sportage, Hyundai Santa Fe,
Subaru Forester, and Toyota RAV4.
See all Small SUVs
|
|
|
|
Last Update: 1/21/08 |
|
|
|