|
Get
email updates from IFCAR.
Reviews of
Large Cars
Impressions and critiques of
large cars. Recommended vehicles are printed in
blue in the list of models, any
model shown in bold blue
was judged to be the best vehicle in this class.
(Model names printed with the reviews will not be colored
whether a vehicle is recommended or not.)
See all Top Picks and Recommended
models by class.
|
Buick LaCrosse

Available As: Midsize/large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $23,940-$32,070
Pros:
Interior quality, refinement, ride comfort.
Cons:
Rear seat space, seat shape, safety ratings.
Overall: A large car with a small back seat
needs more redeeming qualities than the LaCrosse
offers.
Rating:
5/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
8/10 |
|
Practicality |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
The
LaCrosse is an improvement over the huge floaty
barges that represent the stereotypical Buick,
but it has lost too much in the transition. The
soft, comfortable, quiet ride remains, the
quality of the interior has been upgraded, and
handling has improved dramatically, particularly
for the top-of-the-line CXS version. But sit in
the rear seat of this car, and you'll find a
startlingly small amount of leg and head space
on a low, uncomfortable seat. The LaCrosse needs
something to offset the compromised agility, gas
mileage, and price that comes with the larger
size, and a rear seat that is no more
comfortable than a Honda Civic's is the opposite
of what it needs.
A good
all-around large family car is the Ford Taurus,
which is very roomy and handles well, and
is priced comparably to the LaCrosse, but lacks
this Buick's refinement and interior quality.
Consumers willing to spend a bit more to get a
much nicer car should look at the Hyundai Azera
and Kia Amanti,
which offer the same benefits as the LaCrosse
with much more spacious and comfortable
interiors, more power (than the LaCrosse models
with the standard 3.8-liter V6), and better
safety ratings and more safety equipment. And
consumers looking for comfort on a budget should
consider the Hyundai
Sonata and
Kia Optima, which have more interior
space than the LaCrosse and can be purchased
reasonably equipped for under $17,000.
See
the 2006 LaCrosse CXL in the IFCAR Premium
Family Sedan Comparison Test
See
the 2007 LaCrosse CX in the IFCAR Inexpensive
Family Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Buick Lucerne

Available As: Large Mainstream Sedan,
Entry-Lux Sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $26,925-$38,630
Pros:
Interior comfort, ride comfort, refinement.
Cons:
Fuel economy, acceleration (V6).
Overall: Comfort, quiet, quality, and space
without excess handling slop.
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
9/10 |
8/10 |
|
Luxury |
8/10 |
8/10 |
|
Practicality |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
The
Lucerne is one of the better large sedans on the
market. With particularly well-shaped seats, a
very comfortable ride and acceptable handling,
good interior quality, and excellent sound
insulation, it is passable not only in the
mainstream large sedan class with its base
versions but also in the entry-lux class where
fully-loaded models compete. (The Lucerne shares
its mechanicals with the Cadillac DTS.) A V6 and
V8 are available, but the Lucerne is too heavy
for the V6 to offer sufficient power, the V8 is
still outgunned by some competing 6-cylinders,
and neither engine returns particularly good gas
mileage. The top-of-the-line (V8-only) CXS model
includes GM's "magnetic ride control" which
reduces body roll at the expense of some ride
softness. Overall, the Lucerne is a very strong
car, particularly with the optional V8.
However,
the Lucerne isn't cheap. For comfort and luxury
on a budget, consider the Hyundai Azera
and Kia Amanti,
which also offer more power and better fuel
economy than the V8 Lucerne for a much lower
price, though they do not offer the Lucerne's
navigation system. For a focus on comfort and
fuel efficiency in a large luxurious sedan at a
similar price point, consider the Toyota Avalon,
which offers excellent power and surprising gas
mileage, along with most of the Lucerne's strong
points. However, the Lucerne has better-shaped
seats and is slightly more agile, particularly
in the CXS version. And for a lot of space on a
tighter budget, consider the Ford Taurus,
which is very roomy and safe but lacks a luxury feel.
See the 2006 Lucerne CXL
V6 in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2006 Lucerne CXL
V8 in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2006 Lucerne CXS
V8 in the IFCAR Luxury Un-Sport Sedan Comparison
Test
|
|
|
Chevrolet Impala

Available As: Midsize/large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $20,945-$27,970
Pros:
Ride comfort, refinement, interior quality,
trunk space, acceleration (except 3.5-liter),
price.
Cons:
Rear seat space, fuel economy, agility.
Overall:
The cheapest
large sedan, but poor packaging efficiency
leaves it without benefit from its size.
Rating:
6/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to
Large Sedans |
Compared to
All Vehicles |
|
Seat Comfort |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Performance |
5/10 |
4/10 |
|
Fuel Economy |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Safety |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Price |
10/10 |
7/10 |
|
The Impala is very
popular for its low price for such a large car,
for its comfortable and quiet ride, and its
generally pleasant behavior. But poor packaging
means that the Impala isn't any roomier than
many smaller, less-expensive cars that also ride
well and are generally pleasant. Many of those
other cars also handle more nimbly, get better
gas mileage, and have more comfortable seats.
The Impala is a nice enough car, but you can do
better. The V8-powered SS version is a
performance bargain however, though only for
straight line speed, comparing favorably to the
Chrysler 300C and Dodge Charger
twins.
The Hyundai Sonata
and Kia Optima are better choices as inexpensive
and pleasant family sedans than the Impala. They
offer roomy, comfortable, and high-quality
interiors, a long warranty, adequately powerful
4-cylinder or V6 engines, good ride and
handling, and excellent safety ratings. Either
can be had new reasonably equipped for under
$17,000. For a bit more driving enjoyment than
either of those or than the Impala, consider the
Ford Fusion
and Nissan Altima,
which aren't as roomy or smooth riding as the
Sonata and Optima but handle more nimbly, and in
the Altima's case, have a lot more power. The
Honda Accord is roomy and drives well, but is
expensive. For
maximum safety and interior space, consider the Ford
Taurus. For a
combination of interior space and luxury and a
reasonable price (though a higher price than the
Impala's), consider the Hyundai Azera
and Kia Amanti. And the ever-popular Toyota
Camry is a very pleasant car, roomy and quiet, but not agile or inexpensive.
See the 2008 Impala LTZ in
the IFCAR Premium Midsize Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2006 Impala LTZ
and SS in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2007 Impala LS in
the IFCAR Inexpensive 6-passenger Vehicle
Comparison Test
See the 2007 Impala LS in
the IFCAR Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison
Test
|
|
|
|
Chrysler 300

Available As: Large sedan,
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $24,695-$41,905
Pros:
Acceleration (V8s), interior comfort, AWD.
Cons:
Price, fuel economy, visibility.
Overall: The 300 is mediocre in its
mainstream V6 versions, but Hemi V8s add
something to the 300C models.
Rating:
6/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Price |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
The
300 is a large rear-wheel-drive (with optional
all-wheel-drive on some versions) sedan with
expressive styling and powerful V8 engine
options, but for the most part it is rather
mediocre. It is not especially roomy, refined,
agile, or smooth-riding compared to its better
competitors, though adequate in those ways.
Visibility is compromised in all directions by
the car's styling. The standard 2.7-liter V6 is
very weak, and the 3.5-liter V6 on midlevel
versions is still not a class standout in either
performance or refinement. And it's rather
pricey for what it is. V8 300C models offer
outstanding acceleration, but aren't much fun to
drive beyond their straight line acceleration
compared to smaller, lighter competitors. The V8
models are the only ones worth any consideration
from the 300 line, but even they offer only one
standout quality.
Consumers looking for a moderately sporty large
sedan should consider the Nissan Maxima,
which is more agile than the 300 and offers a
standard powerful V6 and a comfortable interior.
If you would like an upscale-feeling sporty
family car but don't need a particularly roomy
back seat, Nissan's cheaper midsize Altima would be
a good choice. If sporty behavior is important
but an upscale feel is not, look at the Honda Accord,
Mazda6, and
Mitsubishi Galant.
And if you are looking for a more traditional
comfort-focused large sedan, consider the
value-priced Ford Five
Hundred, or the more luxurious
Buick Lucerne,
Hyundai Azera,
Kia Amanti,
and Toyota Avalon.
An excellent alternative to the V8 300C is the Infiniti G35,
which offers excellent acceleration along with
much sharper handling, though its rear seat
isn't as roomy.
See the 2006 300 Touring in the IFCAR
Large Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2006 300C in the IFCAR
Large Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Dodge Charger

Available As: Large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $21,820-$36,625
Pros:
Acceleration (V8s).
Cons:
Interior comfort, ride, refinement,
visibility, fuel economy.
Overall: A Chrysler 300 that tries to be
sportier, and fails.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
The
Charger is a rear-wheel-drive large sedan with
available V8s, which seems to make the basics
for a practical modern muscle car. But it isn't.
Though theoretically a sportier version of the
Chrysler 300,
it only offers more aggressive styling (at the
expense of interior comfort and visibility) and
a stiffer ride without a significant improvement
in handling. And the 300 wasn't a fantastic car
to start with, standing out only with its Hemi
V8s, and only then because of its impressive
power. If you must have one of the two large
Chryslers, it should be the Chrysler 300, but
there are better choices than either.
Consumers looking for a moderately sporty large
sedan should consider the Nissan Maxima,
which is more agile than the Charger and offers
a standard powerful V6 and a comfortable
interior. If you would like an upscale-feeling
sporty family car but don't need a particularly
roomy back seat, Nissan's cheaper midsize Altima would be
a good choice. If sporty behavior is important
but an upscale feel is not, look at the Honda Accord,
Mazda6, and
Mitsubishi Galant.
And if you are looking for a more traditional
comfort-focused large sedan, consider the
value-priced Ford Taurus, or the more luxurious
Buick Lucerne,
Hyundai Azera,
Kia Amanti,
and Toyota Avalon.
See the 2006 Charger SXT in the IFCAR
Large Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2006 Charger RT in the IFCAR
Large Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2008 Charger SXT
in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan Comparison
Test
|
|
|
|
Ford Taurus

Available As: Large Family Sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $23,245-$28,695
Pros:
Interior space, safety ratings, ride,
refinement, trunk space, acceleration, fuel
economy, all-wheel-drive.
Cons:
Agility.
Overall: A top-notch family sedan, but
without the premium feel of some like-priced
competitors.
Rating:
9/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Family Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
10/10 |
7/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Safety |
10/10 |
10/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
The 2008 Taurus is
a revised and renamed version of Ford's 2007
Five Hundred, and a substantial improvement over
that car. It retains the Five Hundred's
remarkable interior and trunk space, impeccable
safety ratings, and available all-wheel drive,
while adding more safety equipment, improving
acceleration, refinement, and fuel economy and
lowering the price. However, the Taurus loses
the Five Hundred's relatively sharp handling,
and like the Five Hundred,
it is not the entry-priced luxury sedan
that many other large mainstream sedans are.
Those cars have luxury-level interior quality,
plusher seats, more effortless power, and even
quieter rides. The Taurus more directly competes
against smaller midsize sedan like the Toyota
Camry, offering more room often without a price
disadvantage. And there it excels, a must-see
family sedan.
The Taurus does
not, however, offer a base 4-cylinder version at
budget prices like most midsize competitors, as
Ford splits its family-sedan duty between the
large Taurus and the smaller, cheaper, and
sportier Fusion. Consumers seeking the price and
fuel economy of a 4-cylinder midsize sedan
should focus on the Hyundai Sonata and Kia
Optima, and also look at the Fusion if you want
more sport, and the Honda Accord and Toyota
Camry if you are willing to spend more for
differing benefits. Among large sedans, the
Taurus is the best family car, but consumers
looking for more luxury at the same price point
should look at the Hyundai Azera (though the
Taurus gets better gas mileage, has more space,
and has slightly higher safety ratings), or
spend a bit more on the Buick Lucerne or Toyota
Avalon for a bit more luxury.
See the 2008 Taurus SEL
in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan Comparison
Test
|
|
|
Ford Crown
Victoria

Available As: Large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $24,565-$27,560
Pros:
Interior and trunk space.
Cons:
Handling, fuel economy, interior quality,
acceleration, instrument layout.
Overall: Consumers who enjoy the feel of the
land yachts of yore can find the same benefits
as the Crown Victoria combined with modern
improvements.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Family Cars |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Luxury |
5/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
3/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Depending on how
you look at it, the Ford Crown Victoria (and the
identical Mercury Grand Marquis, and their
upscale Lincoln Town Car variant) can be
considered the oldest vehicles in production. It
had a minor suspension and
styling modification in 2003, a partial redesign
in 1999, another in 1992, and a few
less-significant modifications through the
1980s. One could accurately call the current
vehicles nine (still geriatric by automotive
standards), sixteen, or, going back to the date
of the first Ford full-size sedans on the
“Panther” platform, twenty-nine. Thus, these
current vehicles present a flashback to the days
of V8-powered, rear-wheel-drive, land yachts,
with their twin bench seats, huge trunks, and
soft ride and handling. But as other cars have
changed around them, developments have been made
in interior space efficiency that gives many
smaller vehicles more interior space than these
cars, powertrain efficiency that has given
dozens V6 cars better performance than their
V8s, and safety features that outweigh their
sheer size, while still in some cases
undercutting them in price. In short, the Crown
Victoria accurately replicates the popular cars
of the 1970s, but the standards of excellence
have risen around them. Its resistance to abuse
has hade it a popular police and taxi vehicle,
but there are many better choices for everyday
consumer use.
Fortunately, Ford
also sells a modern large family sedan, the
Taurus. It is physically
smaller than the Crown Victoria, but it has a
larger interior and trunk. It rides comfortably,
but is also more agile and more maneuverable.
Their V6s are more powerful and more
fuel-efficient than the Crown Victoria's V8s.
They have more modern safety equipment and
higher safety ratings. And they're no more
expensive, even after the Crown Victoria's
frequently generous rebates. The Hyundai Azera
and Kia Amanti offer a similar experience with a
particular focus on luxury and refinement, and
for a higher price the Buick Lucerne and Toyota
Avalon offer more of the same. Also try out some
of the roomy midsize family cars to see if
they're not too small before spending extra: the
Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, and Toyota Camry are
reasonable choices.
See the 2006 Crown
Victoria LX Sport in the IFCAR
Large Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Hyundai Azera

Available As: Large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $24,235-$27,355
Pros:
Interior space, interior quality,
refinement, acceleration, price, warranty.
Cons:
Fuel economy.
Overall: Space and luxury for a reasonable
price.
Rating:
9/10
Recommended: YES (IFCAR Top Pick)
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Family Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
8/10 |
9/10 |
|
Luxury |
9/10 |
9/10 |
|
Practicality |
8/10 |
5/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Safety |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
5/10 |
|
For the price of
comparably-equipped midsize family sedan, the
Azera adds to such a car a luxury feel, more
safety equipment, and even more interior space.
It can also be considered a low-cost alternative
to other large luxurious sedans. The Azera is
smooth-riding and quiet, has a spacious and
well-finished interior, and handles surprisingly
well. Its standard V6 is adequately smooth and
strong, but the 3.8-liter V6 on mid- and
high-trim models is silent and effortless in
comparison, but comes at a price premium of
$1,300 between comparably-equipped cars. The
Azera isn't as fuel-efficient as many smaller
competitors, nor is it quite as silent as some
pricier large sedans, but it's an excellent car
at a very competitive price with few obvious
shortcomings.
For maximum luxury
within mainstream prices, consider the V8
versions of the Buick Lucerne. It is very
comfortable inside, rides and handles well for
its size, and offers strong acceleration. It's
more expensive than the Azera however, not as
quick, not as fuel-efficient, and not as nimble.
The Toyota Avalon is more powerful and
fuel-efficient, and slightly quieter and
smoother-riding, but has flatter seats and
clumsier handling, and also costs more. The Ford
Taurus is a quiet, powerful, safe, and spacious
family sedan with competitive pricing but
without the Azera's interior quality. And the
Kia Amanti, which shares some mechanicals with
the Azera, is similar in most ways but has an
even nicer interior but less ride and handling
control.
See
the 2006 Azera Limited in the IFCAR
Premium Family Sedan Comparison Test
See
the 2006 Azera Limited in the IFCAR
Large Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Kia
Amanti

Available As: Large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $25,495
Pros:
Interior comfort, interior quality,
refinement, ride, safety ratings, price,
warranty.
Cons:
Fuel economy, handling.
Overall: A better, $25,000 Lincoln Town Car.
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Large Family Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
8/10 |
8/10 |
|
Luxury |
8/10 |
8/10 |
|
Practicality |
7/10 |
5/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
8/10 |
8/10 |
|
Price |
3/10 |
5/10 |
|
Despite recent
upgrades, the Amanti remains a boat of a car.
Its ride float has been controlled but hardly
eliminated, as has its body roll. Its seems no
attempt was made, however, to fix the numb, slow
steering. Blame the handling on both the
suspension tuning and the car's weight, and the
latter also hurts fuel economy. But if you like
a softer ride, and the handling and fuel economy
aren't deal-breakers, you'll find a surprisingly
good car. Quite literally, everything else about
this car is excellent. The engine is smooth and
powerful, the ride is silent, the seats are
spacious and very well-shaped and comfortable,
the interior is extremely well-detailed and well
laid-out, and the price undercuts most rivals by
a significant margin. Give it the test drive it
deserves more often than it gets before buying
your next large car.
The Hyundai Azera,
which shares some mechanicals with the Amanti,
is a better-rounded choice in the bargain-luxury
segment, with a more controlled ride, better
handling, slightly higher gas mileage, a larger
trunk, and lower-priced base versions, but it
isn't quite as silent, its seats aren't quite as
comfortable, and its interior isn't quite as
nice. (Though it hardly falls short in any of
those ways.) For a similar price, consider the
Ford Taurus, which as a vast interior and trunk,
a smooth and quiet ride, top-notch safety
ratings, and better gas mileage, though it has a
less opulent interior. You could also spend a
more for the Toyota Avalon's additional power
and fuel economy or the Buick Lucerne's blend of
similarly excellent seats and better ride and
handling.
|
|
|
|
Last Update: 1/13/08 |
|
|
|