Get email updates from IFCAR.

Reviews of Large Cars

Impressions and critiques of large cars. Recommended vehicles are printed in blue in the list of models, any model shown in bold blue was judged to be the best vehicle in this class. (Model names printed with the reviews will not be colored whether a vehicle is recommended or not.) See all Top Picks and Recommended models by class.


Buick LaCrosse

Buick Lucerne

Chevrolet Impala

 

Chrysler 300

Dodge Charger

Ford Crown Victoria

 

Ford Taurus

Hyundai Azera

Kia Amanti

MORE COMING SOON

Buick LaCrosse

Available As: Midsize/large sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $23,940-$32,070

Pros: Interior quality, refinement, ride comfort.

Cons: Rear seat space, seat shape, safety ratings.

Overall: A large car with a small back seat needs more redeeming qualities than the LaCrosse offers.

Rating: 5/10

Recommended: NO

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 4/10 6/10
Luxury 7/10 8/10
Practicality 4/10 6/10
Performance 5/10 5/10
Fuel Economy 4/10 6/10
Safety 3/10 4/10
Price 7/10 6/10

The LaCrosse is an improvement over the huge floaty barges that represent the stereotypical Buick, but it has lost too much in the transition. The soft, comfortable, quiet ride remains, the quality of the interior has been upgraded, and handling has improved dramatically, particularly for the top-of-the-line CXS version. But sit in the rear seat of this car, and you'll find a startlingly small amount of leg and head space on a low, uncomfortable seat. The LaCrosse needs something to offset the compromised agility, gas mileage, and price that comes with the larger size, and a rear seat that is no more comfortable than a Honda Civic's is the opposite of what it needs.

 

A good all-around large family car is the Ford Taurus, which is very roomy and handles well, and is priced comparably to the LaCrosse, but lacks this Buick's refinement and interior quality. Consumers willing to spend a bit more to get a much nicer car should look at the Hyundai Azera and Kia Amanti, which offer the same benefits as the LaCrosse with much more spacious and comfortable interiors, more power (than the LaCrosse models with the standard 3.8-liter V6), and better safety ratings and more safety equipment. And consumers looking for comfort on a budget should consider the Hyundai Sonata and Kia Optima, which have more interior space than the LaCrosse and can be purchased reasonably equipped for under $17,000.

 

See the 2006 LaCrosse CXL in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2007 LaCrosse CX in the IFCAR Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test

Buick Lucerne

Available As: Large Mainstream Sedan, Entry-Lux Sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $26,925-$38,630

Pros: Interior comfort, ride comfort, refinement.

Cons: Fuel economy, acceleration (V6).

Overall: Comfort, quiet, quality, and space without excess handling slop.

Rating: 7/10

Recommended: YES

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 9/10 8/10
Luxury 8/10 8/10
Practicality 7/10 6/10
Performance 6/10 6/10
Fuel Economy 3/10 4/10
Safety 6/10 7/10
Price 4/10 5/10

The Lucerne is one of the better large sedans on the market. With particularly well-shaped seats, a very comfortable ride and acceptable handling, good interior quality, and excellent sound insulation, it is passable not only in the mainstream large sedan class with its base versions but also in the entry-lux class where fully-loaded models compete. (The Lucerne shares its mechanicals with the Cadillac DTS.) A V6 and V8 are available, but the Lucerne is too heavy for the V6 to offer sufficient power, the V8 is still outgunned by some competing 6-cylinders, and neither engine returns particularly good gas mileage. The top-of-the-line (V8-only) CXS model includes GM's "magnetic ride control" which reduces body roll at the expense of some ride softness. Overall, the Lucerne is a very strong car, particularly with the optional V8.

 

However, the Lucerne isn't cheap. For comfort and luxury on a budget, consider the Hyundai Azera and Kia Amanti, which also offer more power and better fuel economy than the V8 Lucerne for a much lower price, though they do not offer the Lucerne's navigation system. For a focus on comfort and fuel efficiency in a large luxurious sedan at a similar price point, consider the Toyota Avalon, which offers excellent power and surprising gas mileage, along with most of the Lucerne's strong points. However, the Lucerne has better-shaped seats and is slightly more agile, particularly in the CXS version. And for a lot of space on a tighter budget, consider the Ford Taurus, which is very roomy and safe but lacks a luxury feel.

 

See the 2006 Lucerne CXL V6 in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2006 Lucerne CXL V8 in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2006 Lucerne CXS V8 in the IFCAR Luxury Un-Sport Sedan Comparison Test

Chevrolet Impala

Available As: Midsize/large sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $20,945-$27,970

Pros: Ride comfort, refinement, interior quality, trunk space, acceleration (except 3.5-liter), price.

Cons: Rear seat space, fuel economy, agility.

Overall: The cheapest large sedan, but poor packaging efficiency leaves it without benefit from its size.

Rating: 6/10

Recommended: NO

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 4/10 5/10
Luxury 6/10 6/10
Practicality 5/10 5/10
Performance 5/10 4/10
Fuel Economy 6/10 5/10
Safety 6/10 5/10
Price 10/10 7/10

The Impala is very popular for its low price for such a large car, for its comfortable and quiet ride, and its generally pleasant behavior. But poor packaging means that the Impala isn't any roomier than many smaller, less-expensive cars that also ride well and are generally pleasant. Many of those other cars also handle more nimbly, get better gas mileage, and have more comfortable seats. The Impala is a nice enough car, but you can do better. The V8-powered SS version is a performance bargain however, though only for straight line speed, comparing favorably to the Chrysler 300C and Dodge Charger twins.

 

The Hyundai Sonata and Kia Optima are better choices as inexpensive and pleasant family sedans than the Impala. They offer roomy, comfortable, and high-quality interiors, a long warranty, adequately powerful 4-cylinder or V6 engines, good ride and handling, and excellent safety ratings. Either can be had new reasonably equipped for under $17,000. For a bit more driving enjoyment than either of those or than the Impala, consider the Ford Fusion and Nissan Altima, which aren't as roomy or smooth riding as the Sonata and Optima but handle more nimbly, and in the Altima's case, have a lot more power. The Honda Accord is roomy and drives well, but is expensive. For maximum safety and interior space, consider the Ford Taurus. For a combination of interior space and luxury and a reasonable price (though a higher price than the Impala's), consider the Hyundai Azera and Kia Amanti. And the ever-popular Toyota Camry is a very pleasant car, roomy and quiet, but not agile or inexpensive.

 

See the 2008 Impala LTZ in the IFCAR Premium Midsize Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2006 Impala LTZ and SS in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2007 Impala LS in the IFCAR Inexpensive 6-passenger Vehicle Comparison Test

 

See the 2007 Impala LS in the IFCAR Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test

Chrysler 300

Available As: Large sedan,

Base Price Range (MSRP): $24,695-$41,905

Pros: Acceleration (V8s), interior comfort, AWD.

Cons: Price, fuel economy, visibility.

Overall: The 300 is mediocre in its mainstream V6 versions, but Hemi V8s add something to the 300C models.

Rating: 6/10

Recommended: NO

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 7/10 7/10
Luxury 6/10 7/10
Practicality 5/10 6/10
Performance 7/10 7/10
Fuel Economy 3/10 4/10
Safety 5/10 6/10
Price 5/10 6/10

The 300 is a large rear-wheel-drive (with optional all-wheel-drive on some versions) sedan with expressive styling and powerful V8 engine options, but for the most part it is rather mediocre. It is not especially roomy, refined, agile, or smooth-riding compared to its better competitors, though adequate in those ways. Visibility is compromised in all directions by the car's styling. The standard 2.7-liter V6 is very weak, and the 3.5-liter V6 on midlevel versions is still not a class standout in either performance or refinement. And it's rather pricey for what it is. V8 300C models offer outstanding acceleration, but aren't much fun to drive beyond their straight line acceleration compared to smaller, lighter competitors. The V8 models are the only ones worth any consideration from the 300 line, but even they offer only one standout quality.

 

Consumers looking for a moderately sporty large sedan should consider the Nissan Maxima, which is more agile than the 300 and offers a standard powerful V6 and a comfortable interior. If you would like an upscale-feeling sporty family car but don't need a particularly roomy back seat, Nissan's cheaper midsize Altima would be a good choice. If sporty behavior is important but an upscale feel is not, look at the Honda Accord, Mazda6, and Mitsubishi Galant. And if you are looking for a more traditional comfort-focused large sedan, consider the value-priced Ford Five Hundred, or the more luxurious Buick Lucerne, Hyundai Azera, Kia Amanti, and Toyota Avalon. An excellent alternative to the V8 300C is the Infiniti G35, which offers excellent acceleration along with much sharper handling, though its rear seat isn't as roomy.

 

See the 2006 300 Touring in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2006 300C in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

Dodge Charger

Available As: Large sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $21,820-$36,625

Pros: Acceleration (V8s).

Cons: Interior comfort, ride, refinement, visibility, fuel economy.

Overall: A Chrysler 300 that tries to be sportier, and fails.

Rating: 4/10

Recommended: NO

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 4/10 5/10
Luxury 3/10 4/10
Practicality 5/10 5/10
Performance 7/10 7/10
Fuel Economy 3/10 4/10
Safety 5/10 6/10
Price 7/10 6/10

The Charger is a rear-wheel-drive large sedan with available V8s, which seems to make the basics for a practical modern muscle car. But it isn't. Though theoretically a sportier version of the Chrysler 300, it only offers more aggressive styling (at the expense of interior comfort and visibility) and a stiffer ride without a significant improvement in handling. And the 300 wasn't a fantastic car to start with, standing out only with its Hemi V8s, and only then because of its impressive power. If you must have one of the two large Chryslers, it should be the Chrysler 300, but there are better choices than either.

 

Consumers looking for a moderately sporty large sedan should consider the Nissan Maxima, which is more agile than the Charger and offers a standard powerful V6 and a comfortable interior. If you would like an upscale-feeling sporty family car but don't need a particularly roomy back seat, Nissan's cheaper midsize Altima would be a good choice. If sporty behavior is important but an upscale feel is not, look at the Honda Accord, Mazda6, and Mitsubishi Galant. And if you are looking for a more traditional comfort-focused large sedan, consider the value-priced Ford Taurus, or the more luxurious Buick Lucerne, Hyundai Azera, Kia Amanti, and Toyota Avalon.

 

See the 2006 Charger SXT in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2006 Charger RT in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2008 Charger SXT  in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan Comparison Test

Ford Taurus

Available As: Large Family Sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $23,245-$28,695

Pros: Interior space, safety ratings, ride, refinement, trunk space, acceleration, fuel economy, all-wheel-drive.

Cons: Agility.

Overall: A top-notch family sedan, but without the premium feel of some like-priced competitors.

Rating: 9/10

Recommended: YES

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Family Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 8/10 7/10
Luxury 7/10 7/10
Practicality 10/10 7/10
Performance 6/10 6/10
Fuel Economy 5/10 5/10
Safety 10/10 10/10
Price 7/10 6/10

The 2008 Taurus is a revised and renamed version of Ford's 2007 Five Hundred, and a substantial improvement over that car. It retains the Five Hundred's remarkable interior and trunk space, impeccable safety ratings, and available all-wheel drive, while adding more safety equipment, improving acceleration, refinement, and fuel economy and lowering the price. However, the Taurus loses the Five Hundred's relatively sharp handling, and like the Five Hundred, it is not the entry-priced luxury sedan that many other large mainstream sedans are. Those cars have luxury-level interior quality, plusher seats, more effortless power, and even quieter rides. The Taurus more directly competes against smaller midsize sedan like the Toyota Camry, offering more room often without a price disadvantage. And there it excels, a must-see family sedan.

 

The Taurus does not, however, offer a base 4-cylinder version at budget prices like most midsize competitors, as Ford splits its family-sedan duty between the large Taurus and the smaller, cheaper, and sportier Fusion. Consumers seeking the price and fuel economy of a 4-cylinder midsize sedan should focus on the Hyundai Sonata and Kia Optima, and also look at the Fusion if you want more sport, and the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry if you are willing to spend more for differing benefits. Among large sedans, the Taurus is the best family car, but consumers looking for more luxury at the same price point should look at the Hyundai Azera (though the Taurus gets better gas mileage, has more space, and has slightly higher safety ratings), or spend a bit more on the Buick Lucerne or Toyota Avalon for a bit more luxury.

 

See the 2008 Taurus SEL  in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan Comparison Test

Ford Crown Victoria

Available As: Large sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $24,565-$27,560

Pros: Interior and trunk space.

Cons: Handling, fuel economy, interior quality, acceleration, instrument layout.

Overall: Consumers who enjoy the feel of the land yachts of yore can find the same benefits as the Crown Victoria combined with modern improvements.

Rating: 4/10

Recommended: NO

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Family Cars Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 5/10 6/10
Luxury 5/10 7/10
Practicality 7/10 6/10
Performance 4/10 3/10
Fuel Economy 3/10 4/10
Safety 6/10 7/10
Price 7/10 6/10

Depending on how you look at it, the Ford Crown Victoria (and the identical Mercury Grand Marquis, and their upscale Lincoln Town Car variant) can be considered the oldest vehicles in production. It had a minor suspension and styling modification in 2003, a partial redesign in 1999, another in 1992, and a few less-significant modifications through the 1980s. One could accurately call the current vehicles nine (still geriatric by automotive standards), sixteen, or, going back to the date of the first Ford full-size sedans on the “Panther” platform, twenty-nine. Thus, these current vehicles present a flashback to the days of V8-powered, rear-wheel-drive, land yachts, with their twin bench seats, huge trunks, and soft ride and handling. But as other cars have changed around them, developments have been made in interior space efficiency that gives many smaller vehicles more interior space than these cars, powertrain efficiency that has given dozens V6 cars better performance than their V8s, and safety features that outweigh their sheer size, while still in some cases undercutting them in price. In short, the Crown Victoria accurately replicates the popular cars of the 1970s, but the standards of excellence have risen around them. Its resistance to abuse has hade it a popular police and taxi vehicle, but there are many better choices for everyday consumer use.

 

Fortunately, Ford also sells a modern large family sedan, the Taurus. It is physically smaller than the Crown Victoria, but it has a larger interior and trunk. It rides comfortably, but is also more agile and more maneuverable. Their V6s are more powerful and more fuel-efficient than the Crown Victoria's V8s. They have more modern safety equipment and higher safety ratings. And they're no more expensive, even after the Crown Victoria's frequently generous rebates. The Hyundai Azera and Kia Amanti offer a similar experience with a particular focus on luxury and refinement, and for a higher price the Buick Lucerne and Toyota Avalon offer more of the same. Also try out some of the roomy midsize family cars to see if they're not too small before spending extra: the Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, and Toyota Camry are reasonable choices.

 

See the 2006 Crown Victoria LX Sport in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

Hyundai Azera

Available As: Large sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $24,235-$27,355

Pros: Interior space, interior quality, refinement, acceleration, price, warranty.

Cons: Fuel economy.

Overall: Space and luxury for a reasonable price.

Rating: 9/10

Recommended: YES (IFCAR Top Pick)

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Family Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 8/10 9/10
Luxury 9/10 9/10
Practicality 8/10 5/10
Performance 7/10 6/10
Fuel Economy 4/10 5/10
Safety 7/10 7/10
Price 7/10 5/10

For the price of comparably-equipped midsize family sedan, the Azera adds to such a car a luxury feel, more safety equipment, and even more interior space. It can also be considered a low-cost alternative to other large luxurious sedans. The Azera is smooth-riding and quiet, has a spacious and well-finished interior, and handles surprisingly well. Its standard V6 is adequately smooth and strong, but the 3.8-liter V6 on mid- and high-trim models is silent and effortless in comparison, but comes at a price premium of $1,300 between comparably-equipped cars. The Azera isn't as fuel-efficient as many smaller competitors, nor is it quite as silent as some pricier large sedans, but it's an excellent car at a very competitive price with few obvious shortcomings.

 

For maximum luxury within mainstream prices, consider the V8 versions of the Buick Lucerne. It is very comfortable inside, rides and handles well for its size, and offers strong acceleration. It's more expensive than the Azera however, not as quick, not as fuel-efficient, and not as nimble. The Toyota Avalon is more powerful and fuel-efficient, and slightly quieter and smoother-riding, but has flatter seats and clumsier handling, and also costs more. The Ford Taurus is a quiet, powerful, safe, and spacious family sedan with competitive pricing but without the Azera's interior quality. And the Kia Amanti, which shares some mechanicals with the Azera, is similar in most ways but has an even nicer interior but less ride and handling control.

 

See the 2006 Azera Limited in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan Comparison Test

 

See the 2006 Azera Limited in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test

Kia Amanti

Available As: Large sedan

Base Price Range (MSRP): $25,495

Pros: Interior comfort, interior quality, refinement, ride, safety ratings, price, warranty.

Cons: Fuel economy, handling.

Overall: A better, $25,000 Lincoln Town Car.

Rating: 7/10

Recommended: YES

 

Characteristic: Compared to Large Family Sedans Compared to All  Vehicles
Seat Comfort 8/10 8/10
Luxury 8/10 8/10
Practicality 7/10 5/10
Performance 6/10 5/10
Fuel Economy 3/10 4/10
Safety 8/10 8/10
Price 3/10 5/10

Despite recent upgrades, the Amanti remains a boat of a car. Its ride float has been controlled but hardly eliminated, as has its body roll. Its seems no attempt was made, however, to fix the numb, slow steering. Blame the handling on both the suspension tuning and the car's weight, and the latter also hurts fuel economy. But if you like a softer ride, and the handling and fuel economy aren't deal-breakers, you'll find a surprisingly good car. Quite literally, everything else about this car is excellent. The engine is smooth and powerful, the ride is silent, the seats are spacious and very well-shaped and comfortable, the interior is extremely well-detailed and well laid-out, and the price undercuts most rivals by a significant margin. Give it the test drive it deserves more often than it gets before buying your next large car.

 

The Hyundai Azera, which shares some mechanicals with the Amanti, is a better-rounded choice in the bargain-luxury segment, with a more controlled ride, better handling, slightly higher gas mileage, a larger trunk, and lower-priced base versions, but it isn't quite as silent, its seats aren't quite as comfortable, and its interior isn't quite as nice. (Though it hardly falls short in any of those ways.) For a similar price, consider the Ford Taurus, which as a vast interior and trunk, a smooth and quiet ride, top-notch safety ratings, and better gas mileage, though it has a less opulent interior. You could also spend a more for the Toyota Avalon's additional power and fuel economy or the Buick Lucerne's blend of similarly excellent seats and better ride and handling.

Last Update: 1/13/08

 
© 2008, Institute For Consumer Automotive Research