|
Get
email updates from IFCAR.
Reviews of
Midsize Cars
Impressions and critiques of
midsize cars. Recommended vehicles are printed in
blue in the list of models, any
model shown in bold blue
was judged to be the best vehicle in this class.
(Model names printed with the reviews will not be colored
whether a vehicle is recommended or not.)
See all Top Picks and Recommended
models by class.
|
Buick LaCrosse

Available As: Midsize/large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $23,940-$32,070
Pros:
Interior quality, refinement, ride comfort,
acceleration (3.6-liter).
Cons:
Rear seat space, seat shape, fuel economy
(3.6-liter), safety ratings.
Overall: A large car with a small back seat
needs more redeeming qualities than the LaCrosse
offers.
Rating:
5/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Luxury |
8/10 |
8/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Price |
3/10 |
6/10 |
|
The
LaCrosse is an improvement over the huge floaty
barges that represent the stereotypical Buick,
but it has lost too much in the transition. The
soft, comfortable, quiet ride remains, the
quality of the interior has been upgraded, and
handling has improved dramatically, particularly
for the top-of-the-line CXS version. But sit in
the rear seat of this car, and you'll find a
startlingly small amount of leg and head space
on a low, uncomfortable seat. The LaCrosse needs
something to offset the compromised agility, gas
mileage, and price that comes with the larger
size, and a rear seat that is no more
comfortable than a Honda Civic's is the opposite
of what it needs.
A good
all-around large family car is the Ford Taurus,
which is very roomy and handles well, and
is priced comparably to the LaCrosse, but lacks
this Buick's refinement and interior quality.
Consumers willing to spend a bit more to get a
much nicer car should look at the Hyundai Azera
and Kia Amanti,
which offer the same benefits as the LaCrosse
with much more spacious and comfortable
interiors, more power (than the LaCrosse models
with the standard 3.8-liter V6), and better
safety ratings and more safety equipment. And
consumers looking for comfort on a budget should
consider the Hyundai
Sonata and
Kia Optima, which have more interior
space than the LaCrosse and can be purchased
reasonably equipped for under $17,000.
See
the 2008 LaCrosse CXL in the IFCAR Premium
Family Sedan Comparison Test
See
the 2007 LaCrosse CX in the IFCAR Inexpensive
Family Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Chevrolet Impala

Available As: Midsize/large sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $21,650-$29,030
Pros:
Ride comfort, refinement, interior quality,
trunk space, acceleration (except 3.5-liter).
Cons:
Rear seat space, fuel economy, agility.
Overall:
Though
generally competent, the Impala has no unique
strong points to excuse its shortcomings, except
in the V8-powered SS model.
Rating:
6/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to
Midsize Sedans |
Compared to
All Vehicles |
|
Seat Comfort |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
7/10 |
5/10 |
|
Performance |
5/10 |
4/10 |
|
Fuel Economy |
3/10 |
5/10 |
|
Safety |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
The Impala is very
popular for its low price for such a large car,
for its comfortable and quiet ride, and its
generally pleasant behavior. But poor packaging
means that the Impala isn't any roomier than
many smaller, less-expensive cars that also ride
well and are generally pleasant. Many of those
other cars also handle more nimbly, get better
gas mileage, and have more comfortable seats.
The Impala is a nice enough car, but you can do
better. The V8-powered SS version is a
performance bargain however, though only for
straight line speed, comparing favorably to the
Chrysler 300C and Dodge Charger
twins.
The Hyundai Sonata
and Kia Optima
are better choices as inexpensive and pleasant
family sedans than the Impala. They offer roomy,
comfortable, and high-quality interiors, a long
warranty, adequately powerful 4-cylinder or V6
engines, good ride and handling, and excellent
safety ratings. Either can be had new reasonably
equipped for under $17,000. For a bit more
driving enjoyment than either of those or than
the Impala, consider the Ford Fusion
and Nissan Altima,
which aren't as roomy or smooth riding as the
Sonata and Optima but handle more nimbly, and in
the Altima's case, have a lot more power. The
Honda Accord is roomy and drives well, but is
expensive. For
maximum safety and interior space, consider the Ford
Taurus. For a
combination of interior space and luxury and a
reasonable price (though a higher price than the
Impala's), consider the Hyundai Azera
and Kia Amanti.
And the ever-popular
Toyota Camry is a very pleasant car,
roomy and quiet, but not agile or inexpensive.
See the 2008 Impala LTZ in
the IFCAR Premium Midsize Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2006 Impala LTZ
and SS in the IFCAR Large Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2007 Impala LS in
the IFCAR Inexpensive 6-passenger Vehicle
Comparison Test
See the 2007 Impala LS in
the IFCAR Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison
Test
|
|
|
|
Chevrolet Malibu

Available As: Midsize sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $19,645-$27,095
Pros:
Price, ride, handling, refinement,
acceleration (V6), fuel economy (4-cylinder).
Cons:
Rear seat space, visibility.
Overall: A very nice car, but not practical
enough to be a great family sedan.
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to
Midsize Family Sedans |
Compared to
All Vehicles |
|
Seat Comfort |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
8/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
7/10 |
5/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel Economy |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
The
new-for-2008 Malibu excels at the very thing its
predecessor did not: providing an upscale feel.
The car now offers smooth power, a quiet ride,
steering feel, and improved interior quality,
along with newly expressive styling. But it also
lost track of the strengths found in the
function-over-form car it replaced, as it now
lacks rear seat space (despite its newly
expanded dimensions) and is hard to see out of.
These complaints may seem minor against the
Malibu's many strong points, but in such a
highly-competitive class, they are enough to
push it below the many other highly capable
family sedans that don't make such needless
sacrifices.
The
Hyundai Sonata
and
Kia Optima
are better choices as inexpensive and pleasant
family sedans than the Impala. They offer roomy,
comfortable, and high-quality interiors, a long
warranty, adequately powerful 4-cylinder or V6
engines, good ride and handling, and excellent
safety ratings. Either can be had new reasonably
equipped for under $17,000. For a bit more
driving enjoyment than either of those or than
the Impala, consider the
Ford Fusion
and Nissan Altima,
which aren't as roomy or smooth riding as the
Sonata and Optima but handle more nimbly, and in
the Altima's case, have a lot more power. The
Honda Accord
is spacious and drives well, but is expensive. And the ever-popular
Toyota Camry is a very pleasant car,
roomy and quiet, but not agile or inexpensive.
See the 2008 Malibu LTZ in
the IFCAR Premium Midsize Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Chrysler Sebring

Available As: Midsize sedan and convertible
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $19,110-$32,375
Pros:
Price, fuel economy (4-cylinder),
acceleration (3.5-liter).
Cons:
Interior comfort, interior quality, trunk
space, ride, handling, refinement (2.4-liter).
Overall: Unacceptable even at its low price.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Cars |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Luxury |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
9/10 |
8/10 |
|
The
Sebring sedan was just redesigned for 2007, but did not come to the
market competitive even with long-existing
models. As with its twin, the Dodge Avenger,
it is not only mediocre but almost risibly
inferior in a remarkable number of ways. The
interior, as in many Chrysler products, is
sloppily assembled from the cheapest plastics.
The seats are hard, poorly shaped, and
uncomfortable. The trunk is small. The ride
lacks control and the car handles clumsily. The
two base engines are weak, and even the
line-topping 3.5-liter V6 isn't at the level of
some competitors, and gets poor gas mileage for
a family sedan. Chrysler clearly hopes to excuse
the Sebring's consistent inferiority with low
prices, but until it significantly undercuts
every competitor (though hardly expensive, it
currently doesn't come close), there is no
reason to even consider it. The convertible is a
rare choice in a shrinking market, and is an
acceptable choice by default. Although it shares
most of the sedan's vices, it is more
comfortable and practical than most like-priced
drop-tops, and comes with a retractable hardtop
on high-end models.
The Hyundai Sonata
and Kia Optima
are far better choices as inexpensive and pleasant
family sedans than the Sebring. They offer roomy,
comfortable, and high-quality interiors, a long
warranty, adequately powerful 4-cylinder or V6
engines, good ride and handling, and excellent
safety ratings. Either can be had new reasonably
equipped for under $17,000. For a bit more
driving enjoyment than either of those, consider the Ford Fusion, Honda Accord,
and Nissan Altima,
which aren't as roomy or smooth riding as the
Sonata and Optima and (except for the Ford) are
more expensive than any of the three, but handle
more nimbly, and in the Altima's case, have a
lot more power. And the ever-popular Toyota Camry is
a very pleasant car, roomy and quiet, but not
agile or inexpensive. Among convertibles, the
Toyota Solara is more luxurious and comfortable,
but costs more and lacks a retractable hardtop,
and the Pontiac G6 hardtop has a tiny rear seat
and trunk, but both are better all-around cars
than the Sebring.
See the 2007 Sebring
Touring in the IFCAR Inexpensive Family Sedan
Comparison Test
See the 2008 Sebring
Limited sedan in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan
Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Dodge Avenger

Available As: Midsize sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $18,910-$25,590
Pros:
Price, fuel economy (4-cylinder),
acceleration (3.5-liter).
Cons:
Interior comfort, interior quality, trunk
space, ride, handling, refinement (2.4-liter).
Overall: Unacceptable even at its low price.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Cars |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Luxury |
3/10 |
4/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
9/10 |
8/10 |
|
The
Avenger was just introduced for 2008 to replace
the old Dodge Stratus, but did not come to the
market competitive even with long-existing
models. As with its twin, the Chrysler Sebring,
it is not only mediocre but almost risibly
inferior in a remarkable number of ways. The
interior, as in many Chrysler products, is
sloppily assembled from the cheapest plastics.
The seats are hard, poorly shaped, and
uncomfortable. The trunk is small. The ride
lacks control and the car handles clumsily. The
two base engines are weak, and even the
line-topping 3.5-liter V6 isn't at the level of
some competitors, and gets poor gas mileage for
a family sedan. Dodge clearly hopes to excuse
the Dodge's consistent inferiority with low
prices, but until it significantly undercuts
every competitor, there is no
reason to even consider it.
The Hyundai Sonata
and Kia Optima
are far better choices as inexpensive and pleasant
family sedans than the Avenger. They offer roomy,
comfortable, and high-quality interiors, a long
warranty, adequately powerful 4-cylinder or V6
engines, good ride and handling, and excellent
safety ratings. Either can be had new reasonably
equipped for under $17,000. For a bit more
driving enjoyment than either of those, consider the Ford Fusion, Honda Accord,
and Nissan Altima,
which aren't as roomy or smooth riding as the
Sonata and Optima and (except for the Ford) are
more expensive than any of the three, but handle
more nimbly, and in the Altima's case, have a
lot more power. And the ever-popular Toyota Camry is
a very pleasant car, roomy and quiet, but not
agile or inexpensive.
See the 2008 Avenger SXT in the IFCAR
Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test
See the 2008 Avenger R/T
in the IFCAR Premium Family Sedan Comparison
Test
|
|
|
|
Dodge Magnum

Available As: Midsize station wagon
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $23,420-$38,105
Pros:
Acceleration (V8), rear seat space.
Cons:
Acceleration (2.7-liter), fuel economy,
cargo space, visibility.
Overall: This Dodge Charger station wagon is
more practical than the sedan version, but
suffers most of the same other vices.
Rating:
5/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Cars |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Luxury |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Practicality |
9/10 |
7/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
2/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
2/10 |
6/10 |
|
With the
Magnum, Dodge put a 340-horsepower V8 into a
station wagon body, to offer performance and
practicality. Unfortunately, the optional V8 is
the only sporty aspect of the car, and the
wagon's inherent practicality is diminished by
the style-focused low roof, cutting into cargo
space. The styling also cuts into visibility.
The Magnum handles like the large car that it
is, leaving V6 versions with nothing going for
them but a comfortable rear seat, which is
hardly rare among family cars. The concept of
the sporty wagon works, but the execution is
lacking, and the V6 versions have only the
styling in their favor.
If you
want a true sporty wagon, look at the Subaru
Legacy and Mazda6, which offer performance,
handling, comfort, and practicality on a scale
beyond the Magnum's, which has the available V8
as its only advantage. Another option for a
combination of acceleration and practicality is
the Toyota RAV4, a compact SUV with an available
268-horsepower V6.
|
|
|
|
Ford Fusion

Available As: Midsize sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $17,295-$23,825
Pros:
Price, ride, handling, interior comfort,
fuel economy (4-cylinder), available AWD.
Cons:
Fuel economy (V6).
Overall: A well-rounded well-priced family
sedan with more sport than most.
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Family
Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
The Fusion, and
its twin the Mercury Milan, is a well-rounded
midsize sedan whose weak points are generally
only areas where it doesn't stand out in its
competitive class rather than where it falls
short. Though it isn't as vastly roomy as some
competitors, it offers a very comfortable
interior, and rides and handles well. (While
it's nimble for a midsize sedan, but unlike the
related Mazda6, it's not as sporty as it
pretends to be.) Get the peppy and economical
4-cylinder over the pricier V6 (unless you need
the V6-only AWD option), which doesn't
add as much power and refinement as it should to
justify the added cost and decreased fuel
economy.
The Hyundai Sonata
and Kia Optima are well-rounded and quite
inexpensive, and the V6 Sonata is powerful, but
neither car handles as nimbly as the Fusion or
offers all-wheel-drive. The related Mazda6
offers sharper handling than the Fusion, but a
bit less interior space and a stiffer ride on
some versions. The Honda Accord offers a similar
driving experience to the Fusion with a
higher-quality feel and more refined engines,
but costs more and has a smaller trunk. The
Nissan Altima offers excellent 4- and 6-cylinder
engines and good ride and handling, but a
somewhat cramped rear seat and a higher price
than the Fusion.
See the 2006 Fusion SEL
3.0-liter in the IFCAR Premium Family
Comparison Test
See the 2007 Fusion SE
2.3-liter in the IFCAR Inexpensive Family
Comparison Test
See the 2007 Fusion SE
3.0-liter in the IFCAR
Inexpensive Family Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Honda Accord

Available As: Midsize coupe and sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $
Pros:
Interior space and comfort, ride, handling,
acceleration (V6), fuel economy.
Cons:
Price, trunk space.
Overall: It's not cheap, but with its
combination of space, comfort, and driving
enjoyment, it's not overpriced.
Rating:
9/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Family Cars |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
The Accord was
redesigned and enlarged for 2008 to give it even
more mainstream appeal. Despite its ubiquity in
the market, the previous version was criticized
for its relatively firm ride, relatively small
back seat, and relatively loud tires, when
compared to its Toyota Camry rival. But while
the Accord has softened a bit, it continues to
offer competitive handling and more driving
enjoyment than most other family sedans, all
while improving its ride, refinement, and
interior space. Fuel economy has also improved,
as has V6 acceleration. The trunk remains
somewhat small, the rear seat still folds only
in one piece, and the discounts that graced the
last year of the previous Accord have
evaporated. But the latest Accord is a top-notch
family sedan, and worth a look even at its lofty
price.
|
|
|
|
Hyundai Sonata

Available As: Midsize Family Sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $17,345-$23,345
Pros:
Price, interior space, fuel economy
(4-cylinder), safety ratings, ride, interior
quality, warranty, trunk space, acceleration
(V6).
Cons:
Fuel economy (V6).
Overall: Comfortable, safe, and inexpensive
with no glaring weaknesses.
Rating:
9/10
Recommended: YES (IFCAR Top Pick)
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Family
Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
6/10 |
4/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
10/10 |
8/10 |
|
Drive the Sonata,
and no aspects of it are likely jump out to wow
you. It's not stylish or sporty or luxurious.
But that doesn't make it any less of an
excellent family car, because much of what makes
it excellent is what won't be noticed. Like
bumps on the road, or excessive noise, or a lack
of power, or discomfort from cramped or poorly
shaped seats. And just driving it, you can't
notice the safety ratings, the fuel economy (on
the four-cylinder model), or the excellent price
and warranty coverage. If you aren't looking for
your family sedan to excite you, the Sonata's
ride, refinement, interior space and quality,
safety, and value should put it at or near the
top of your shopping list.
The closest thing
to cross-shop the Sonata against is the Kia
Optima. The two offer a similar feel, the same
warranty, and similarly low prices, but the
Sonata is a bit roomier and has a larger V6, and
the Optima is quieter, has a nicer interior, and
handles better. Choose between the two based on
your preferences on their slight differences,
and based on whichever is selling for less when
you buy. If you're looking for the family sedan
basics with a touch of sport, consider the Honda
Accord and Ford Fusion, but expect to pay quite
a bit extra for the Honda and to give up some
refinement, interior quality, and power with the
Fusion. If you want more space and luxury,
consider upgrading to Hyundai's own Azera, or
the Ford Taurus. For the family sedan basics
done at a near ideal, consider the Toyota Camry,
though it has some cheap interior details and a
relatively high price. And for a sporty family
sedan, consider the Nissan Altima, Mazda6, or
Mitsubishi Galant.
See
the 2007 Sonata GLS in the IFCAR
Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test
See
the 2007 Sonata SE in the IFCAR
Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Kia
Optima

Available As: Midsize Family Sedan
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $16,355-$20,400
Pros:
Price, interior comfort, fuel economy
(4-cylinder), safety ratings, ride, interior
quality, warranty.
Cons:
Trunk space.
Overall: Comfortable, safe, and inexpensive
with no glaring weaknesses.
Rating:
9/10
Recommended: YES (IFCAR Top Pick)
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize Family
Sedans |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
6/10 |
4/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Safety |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
10/10 |
8/10 |
|
Drive the Optima,
and no aspects of it are likely jump out to wow
you. It's not stylish or sporty or luxurious.
But that doesn't make it any less of an
excellent family car, because much of what makes
it excellent is what won't be noticed. Like
bumps on the road, or excessive noise, or a lack
of power, or discomfort from cramped or poorly
shaped seats. And just driving it, you can't
notice the safety ratings, the fuel economy (on
the four-cylinder model), or the excellent price
and warranty coverage. If you aren't looking for
your family sedan to excite you, the Optima's
ride, refinement, interior comfort and quality,
safety, and value should put it at or near the
top of your shopping list.
The closest thing
to cross-shop the Optima against is the Hyundai
Sonata. The two offer a similar feel, the same
warranty, and similarly low prices, but the
Sonata is a bit roomier and has a larger V6, and
the Optima is quieter, has a nicer interior, and
handles better. Choose between the two based on
your preferences on their slight differences,
and based on whichever is selling for less when
you buy. If you're looking for the family sedan
basics with a touch of sport, consider the Honda
Accord and Ford Fusion, but expect to pay quite
a bit extra for the Honda and to give up some
refinement, interior quality, and power with the
Fusion. If you want more space and luxury,
consider upgrading to the Hyundai Azera or Kia's
own Amanti, or
the Ford Taurus. For the family sedan basics
done at a near ideal, consider the Toyota Camry,
though it has some cheap interior details and a
relatively high price. And for a sporty family
sedan, consider the Nissan Altima, Mazda6, or
Mitsubishi Galant.
See
the 2007 Optima LX 4-cylinder in the IFCAR
Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test
See
the 2007 Optima LX V6 in the IFCAR
Inexpensive Family Sedan Comparison Test
|
|
|
|
Last Update: 1/13/08 |
|
|
|