|
Get
email updates from IFCAR.
Reviews of
Midsize SUVs
Impressions and critiques of
midsize SUVs. Recommended vehicles are printed in
blue in the list of models, any
model shown in bold blue
was judged to be the best vehicle in this class.
(Model names printed with the reviews will not be colored
whether a vehicle is recommended or not.)
See all Top Picks and Recommended
models by class.

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $32,790-$37,040
Pros:
Interior space, ride, handling, refinement.
Cons:
Visibility, price.
Overall: A spacious and luxurious midsize
SUV that
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
10/10 |
9/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
8/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
The Enclave is an
uplevel version of the GMC Acadia and Saturn
Outlook. All are comfortable, spacious, and
refined, and for a higher price tag, the Enclave
adds a touch more refinement, ride comfort, and
interior quality. None are particularly
powerful, however, and rearward visibility could
be better. But most significantly, while the
three SUVs are largely similar, the Enclave has
by far the highest price. Look to the other two
before buying one, and come back to the Enclave
only after deciding that its slight upgrades
were worth it.
Another excellent
midsize SUV to consider is the Ford Taurus X,
which is quiet but otherwise un-luxurious, but
is well-priced, comfortable, safe, and spacious,
though it doesn't have quite as much cargo space
as the Acadia. The Hyundai Veracruz has a
luxurious interior and a very quiet ride, and is
roomy and comfortable, but isn't as agile or
spacious as the Acadia, and lacks a price
advantage. The Honda Pilot is a roomy, somewhat
utilitarian SUV that lacks the Acadia's luxury
but is all-around competent. The Mazda CX-9 is
the class leader for consumers interested in
nimble handling, and the Chrysler Pacifica is a
good value alternative, but neither are as roomy
as the Acadia. And, for those willing to
consider them, minivans are excellent
alternatives to FWD car-based midsize SUVs. Note
that these vehicles do not do the same off-road
or towing duty as good truck-based models, like
the Nissan Pathfinder or larger models like the
Dodge Durango and Ford Expedition.
|
|
|
Chevrolet
TrailBlazer

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $27,405-$33,950
Pros:
Acceleration (V8), price, ride comfort.
Cons:
Handling, interior quality, no 3rd-row seat,
fuel economy, safety ratings.
Overall: Relatively inexpensive but without
other redeeming qualities.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to
Midsize SUVs |
Compared to
All Vehicles |
|
Seat Comfort |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
Luxury |
5/10 |
4/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
4/10 |
|
Fuel Economy |
4/10 |
3/10 |
|
Safety |
2/10 |
4/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
The TrailBlazer
and its clones, the
Buick Rainier,
GMC Envoy,
and Isuzu Ascender,
date back to 2002, and were mediocre even then.
It still has a comfortable ride for a
truck-based SUV and a strong optional V8, but
handles clumsily, has dreadful interior quality,
offers no third-row seat (the extended-length
EXT version has been discontinued), gets poor
gas mileage, and has unsupportive seats. It's
deeply discounted, but even at lower prices it's
not worth the money. The SS model is the cheaper
of two choices for sporty truck-based SUVs with
powerful V8s, and is the better value of the
two, but it's the only TrailBlazer you should
consider.
If you don't need
your SUV to be a true truck with heavy duty
towing and off-road capability, consider a
car-based SUV, such as the Honda Pilot, GMC Acadia/Saturn
Outlook,
Ford Freestyle, or Toyota Highlander.
These are more expensive than the TrailBlazer,
but all are much more comfortable, agile, safe,
and fuel-efficient. If you do need a truck for
off-road or towing duty, consider the Ford Explorer
and Nissan Pathfinder,
though if you will be using your SUV only as a
car, you don't need to make the sacrifices in
driving dynamics and gas mileage with those
models.
|
|
Chrysler Pacifica

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $24,635-$36,195
Pros:
Price, ride comfort, interior comfort,
acceleration (except base model).
Cons:
Agility, visibility.
Overall: A safe, comfortable, and
well-priced family vehicle.
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
6/10 |
8/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
4/10 |
3/10 |
|
Safety |
7/10 |
8/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
The
Pacifica falls into the market category of
"crossover", meaning that it's a car-based SUV
that attempts to offer the benefits of a minivan
without a minivan appearance. And while it
doesn't quite do that, as it has significantly
less third-row seat and cargo space and seating
for only six passengers, it is a much better
family vehicle than most other midsize SUVs, and
costs less than most competing crossovers.
The Ford Taurus X
is roomier than the Pacifica, handles more
nimbly, offers seating for six or seven
passengers rather than the Pacifica's choice of
five or six, and gets better gas mileage. But
the Pacifica is more powerful and refined, has
better-shaped seats, and has a more luxurious
interior. The GMC
Acadia and
Saturn Outlook twins offer most of
the Taurus X's benefits (its gas mileage isn't
as good though) with even more interior space
and a luxury feel, though it's expensive and the
Pacifica again has more power and better-shaped
seats. And a minivan will be much roomier and
comparably-priced.
|
|

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $25,320-$28,965
Pros:
Safety ratings, acceleration.
Cons:
No 3rd-row seat, cargo space, fuel economy,
price.
Overall: Too heavy and too expensive to get
away with offering an interior as small and
cheap.
Rating:
5/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
3/10 |
7/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
3/10 |
|
Safety |
10/10 |
10/10 |
|
Price |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
The new-for-2007
Edge is a stylish midsize SUV squeezed into an
already-full lineup of Ford midsize SUVs, which
also includes the three-row Freestyle (soon to
be redesigned as the Taurus X) and Explorer
models. And the Edge does not stand out except
for its appearance, though it may make a decent
first impression with its acceptable 5-passenger
comfort, its comfortable and quiet ride, its
powerful V6, its competitive base price, and its
top-notch safety ratings. But other
considerations make it much less appealing. The
Edge isn't particularly big, lacking a third row
seat and offering almost no more cargo space
than Ford's much smaller and cheaper Escape, yet
it is very heavy, which makes it handle and use
gasoline like a larger, roomier SUV. The engine
is too loud under acceleration. The interior is
cheaply constructed. And when options are added,
the Edge gets expensive quickly. Don't let the
first impression fool you: you can do better
than the Edge.
If the
Edge has enough space for you, consider
saving money and getting a compact SUV.
The Hyundai Santa Fe is spacious,
luxurious, and relatively inexpensive,
and has a long warranty. The Toyota RAV4
isn't particularly refined, but rides
and handles well and is available with a
powerful V6 that gets very good gas
mileage for an SUV. If you don't need a
lot of power, the Honda CR-V is
comfortable, refined, and
fuel-efficient. And to save even more
money, consider the budget-priced
Hyundai Tucson / Kia Sportage twins and
Ford's own Escape. If you would like the
space of a traditional midsize SUV, more
than the Edge offers, consider the GMC
Acadia / Saturn Outlook twins, the Honda
Pilot, and the Ford Freestyle/Taurus X.
And if you want a 5-passenger midsize
SUV that delivers the sport that the
Edge's styling seems to promise, look at
the Mitsubishi Endeavor and Nissan
Murano.
|
|
|
Ford Explorer

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $25,300-$34,895
Pros:
Price, interior space, ride comfort, towing
capacity, refinement (V8).
Cons:
Agility, interior quality, instrument
layout, acceleration and refinement
(V6), fuel economy.
Overall: A relatively capable and
inexpensive truck that should be reserved for
those who need a truck.
Rating:
6/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
8/10 |
8/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
4/10 |
3/10 |
|
Safety |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
The Explorer
effectively created the family SUV market when
it was introduced in 1991, offering the image
and capability of a truck in a package with as
many benefits of a station wagon as possible.
Until recently, it was the best-selling SUV in
the United States, though it is suddenly no
longer in contention for the title. For while
the 1991 Explorer was the most civilized
mainstream truck, the 2007 Explorer faces
competition from car-based competitors, which
can offer better driving dynamics, roomier
interiors, and better gas mileage. The Explorer,
like its twin, the Mercury Mountaineer, remains
spacious, comfortable, and quiet for a
truck-based SUV, which is good for families who
need to tow heavy trailers or go farther off
road than a car-based competitor could. But
others will be able to get better acceleration,
more refinement, a more comfortable ride, better
fuel economy, more interior space, and better
handling: all virtually inherent in a car-based
design. The Explorer's additional flaws,
unrelated to its basic design, include a poor
instrument layout and a cheap interior, making
it an SUV to be tolerated by those who need its
capability. Its strengths make it relatively
easy to tolerate, but light-duty users should
look elsewhere.
Some car-based
midsize SUVs to consider when possible instead
of the Explorer are the GMC Acadia / Saturn
Outlook twins, the Mazda CX-9, and the Honda
Pilot, which offer roomy interiors and very good
driving dynamics but cost more than the
Explorer. Ford's own Freestyle is actually less
expensive and highly capable, but not very
powerful or refined. A good truck-based
alternative to the Explorer is the larger Dodge
Durango, which is frequently discounted to
competitive prices and is highly capable, very
roomy, and drives well for a large truck-based
SUV. The smaller Nissan Pathfinder is also an
acceptable choice if you don't need the
Explorer's passenger space.
|
|
|
|
Ford Taurus X

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $26,615-$31,800
Pros:
Interior space, safety ratings, refinement,
fuel economy, ride comfort, acceleration.
Cons:
Agility.
Overall: No longer a value leader and still
lacking in luxury, but more powerful and refined
than before, and still roomy and safe.
Rating:
8/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
9/10 |
8/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
6/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
10/10 |
10/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
5/10 |
|
The Taurus X is a
facelifted and renamed version of the 2007 Ford
Freestyle. In the transition, it picked up a
larger engine and a softer ride, but lost some
agility and price advantage. However, the basics
keep the Taurus X a highly competitive vehicle.
It achieved top safety ratings in NHTSA and IIHS
testing, it has a relatively comfortable third
row with usable space behind it, and it is more
maneuverable than some competitors. But despite
additional refinement it received for 2008, it
still lacks the interior quality to be
considered as luxurious as some competitors,
which may be a deal-breaker for some when seeing
the price. But the Taurus X is a safe,
practical, and relatively fuel-efficient midsize
SUV worth a good look from shoppers in this
class.
The GMC Acadia /
Saturn Outlook twins offer the Taurus X's
benefits of a roomy interior with usable
third-row seating, as well as better handling
and interior quality and more cargo space.
However, they aren't as easy to load, as
maneuverable, or as fuel-efficient as the Taurus
X. The Hyundai Veracruz offers a bit more
refinement and a much nicer interior, but
without the brand's traditional price advantage.
The Mazda CX-9 is the class leader for consumers
interested in nimble handling, and the Chrysler
Pacifica is a good value alternative, but
neither are as roomy as the Taurus X. And, for
those willing to consider them, minivans are
excellent alternatives to FWD car-based midsize
SUVs. Note that these vehicles do not do the
same off-road or towing duty as truck-based
models, like the Nissan Pathfinder or larger
models like the Dodge Durango and Ford
Expedition.
|
|
GMC Acadia

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $29,255-$35,225
Pros:
Interior space, ride, handling, refinement.
Cons:
Visibility.
Overall: Spacious, comfortable, and quiet; a
very good all-around vehicle.
Rating:
8/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Practicality |
10/10 |
9/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
8/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
The
Acadia is larger than most of its competitors,
inside and out, but tends to feel its size
inside, where up to eight passengers have
reasonably comfortable seating and where there
is plenty of cargo space. But except in tight,
low-speed maneuvers, it doesn't feel huge to the
driver, handling more nimbly than many smaller
competitors, truck- and car-based. It also rides
comfortably and very quietly. However, though
its size does not hurt its handling, it does
limit the potency and efficiency of the Acadia's
3.6-liter V6 engine, which is less powerful and
gets lower gas mileage than most car-based
competitors. Visibility could also be better,
and the high cargo floor makes loading heavy
items somewhat troublesome. The second-row bench
seat (captain's chairs are optional) is too low.
And it's not inexpensive. But the Acadia does
most things very well, and its shortcomings are
relatively insignificant. Definitely consider it
in your midsize SUV search.
Before buying the
Acadia, cross-shop it with the near-identical
Saturn Outlook, which has al lower sticker price
but only sells at that price. Buy whichever of
the two you find a better deal on. Another
excellent midsize SUV to consider is the Ford
Taurus X, which is quiet but otherwise
un-luxurious, but is well-priced, comfortable,
safe, and spacious, though it doesn't have quite
as much cargo space as the Acadia. The Hyundai
Veracruz has a luxurious interior and a very
quiet ride, and is roomy and comfortable, but
isn't as agile or spacious as the Acadia, and
lacks a price advantage. The Honda Pilot is a
roomy, somewhat utilitarian SUV that lacks the
Acadia's luxury but is all-around competent. The
Mazda CX-9 is the class leader for consumers
interested in nimble handling, and the Chrysler
Pacifica is a good value alternative, but
neither are as roomy as the Acadia. And, for
those willing to consider them, minivans are
excellent alternatives to FWD car-based midsize
SUVs. Note that these vehicles do not do the
same off-road or towing duty as truck-based
models, like the Nissan Pathfinder or larger
models like the Dodge Durango and Ford
Expedition.
|
|
|
GMC
Envoy

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $26,560-$36,990
Pros:
Acceleration (V8), price, ride comfort.
Cons:
Handling, interior quality, no 3rd-row seat,
fuel economy, safety ratings.
Overall: Relatively inexpensive but without
other redeeming qualities.
Rating:
4/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
4/10 |
6/10 |
|
Luxury |
5/10 |
4/10 |
|
Practicality |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
4/10 |
4/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
4/10 |
3/10 |
|
Safety |
2/10 |
4/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
The
Envoy and its clones, the
Buick Rainier,
Chevrolet TrailBlazer,
and Isuzu Ascender,
date back to 2002, and were mediocre even then.
It still has a comfortable ride for a
truck-based SUV and a strong optional V8, but
handles clumsily, has dreadful interior quality,
offers no third-row seat (the extended-length
EXT version has been discontinued), gets poor
gas mileage, and has unsupportive seats. It's
deeply discounted, but even at lower prices it's
not worth the money.
If you
don't need your SUV to be a true truck with
heavy duty towing and off-road capability,
consider a car-based SUV, such as the Honda Pilot, GMC Acadia/Saturn
Outlook,
Ford Taurus X, or Toyota Highlander.
These are more expensive than the Envoy, but all
are much more comfortable, agile, safe, and
fuel-efficient. If you do need a truck
for off-road or towing duty, consider the Ford Explorer
and Nissan Pathfinder,
though if you will be using your SUV only as a
car, you don't need to make the sacrifices in
driving dynamics and gas mileage with those
models.
|
|
|
Honda Pilot

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $27,095-$33,245
Pros:
Interior space, safety ratings, ride, interior quality.
Cons:
Price.
Overall: A strong contender without the
luxury of many newer competitors.
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
6/10 |
6/10 |
|
Practicality |
8/10 |
8/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
6/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
10/10 |
10/10 |
|
Price |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
The Pilot is the
oldest design among midsize car-based SUVs still
on the market, and the market has taken off
around it. But it remains highly competitive.
Though newer competitors include more luxurious
interiors and quieter rides, the Pilot's bland
interior is very well-assembled and it rides
well enough. And unlike some competitors, its
functionality is uncompromised by its styling,
leading to good space efficiency with adequate
third-row seating and good cargo space. Updates
have also provided it with contemporary safety
equipment, more than in some newer competitors.
The Pilot is a bit pricey for its concentration
of utility over luxury, but it does what it does
quite well.
For more luxury
than the Pilot, consider the Hyundai Veracruz
and GMC Acadia / Saturn Outlook twins. Both are
quiet and have high-quality interiors that look
less basic than the Pilot's, and offer good ride
and handling, spacious interiors, and better gas
mileage. The Pilot has better visibility and a
more comfortable second-row seat, and is
generally less expensive than the Acadia (though
none of the three are inexpensive.) The Ford
Taurus X is similar to the Pilot in its function
over form, but is quieter and more
fuel-efficient, though it isn't as nice inside.
Those who want a sportier driving experience
should consider the Mazda CX-9, and value
seekers should look to the Chrysler Pacifica.
And consumers looking to tow or go off-road
should consider the Ford Explorer and Nissan
Pathfinder, and the larger Ford Expedition,
Dodge Durango, and Nissan Armada.
|
|
|
|
Hyundai Veracruz

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $26,345-$34,005
Pros:
Interior space, interior quality,
refinement, warranty, safety.
Cons:
Agility, visibility.
Overall: Luxurious and spacious, but it
needs to be closer to perfect to be a class
leader without a price advantage.
Rating:
7/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
8/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
9/10 |
9/10 |
|
Practicality |
6/10 |
8/10 |
|
Performance |
7/10 |
6/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
6/10 |
4/10 |
|
Safety |
10/10 |
5/10 |
|
Price |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Hyundai has tried
to call the Veracruz its breakthrough vehicle,
one that will allow it to compete on substance
rather than price. But while the Veracruz would
have been an excellent value alternative to
other midsize SUVs, it can't be a class leader
at their price point. It lacks the power, fuel
economy, agility, and ride comfort of many
others in its class, though it's hardly poor in
any of those ways. But to sell at the same
price, it must do virtually everything as well
as its engine refinement, its interior space and
comfort, and its interior quality. It doesn't.
It's still worth considering in its class, but
it's not the class leader Hyundai tried to
create.
The GMC Acadia /
Saturn Outlook twins offer the Veracruz's
benefits of a roomy interior with usable
third-row seating, as well as better ride and
handling and more cargo space, but aren't as
quick, don't have the same interior quality, and
aren't as quiet. The Ford Taurus X is quiet but
otherwise un-luxurious, but is well-priced,
comfortable, safe, and spacious. The Mazda CX-9
is the class leader for consumers interested in
nimble handling, and the Chrysler Pacifica is a
good value alternative, but neither are as roomy
as the Veracruz. And, for those willing to
consider them, minivans are excellent
alternatives to FWD car-based midsize SUVs. Note
that these vehicles do not do the same off-road
or towing duty as truck-based models, like the
Nissan Pathfinder or larger models like the
Dodge Durango and Ford Expedition.
|
|
|
|
Jeep Commander

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $29,255-$35,225
Pros:
Ride, price, towing capacity, warranty,
acceleration (5.7-liter).
Cons:
Fuel economy, acceleration (V6),
refinement (V6), cargo space, third-row-seat
space, visibility.
Overall: Not outstandingly capable on or off
the road, but adequate in either situation.
Rating:
6/10
Recommended: YES
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
7/10 |
7/10 |
|
Luxury |
5/10 |
5/10 |
|
Practicality |
6/10 |
7/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
2/10 |
|
Safety |
Unknown |
Unknown |
|
Price |
7/10 |
5/10 |
|
The
Commander is a reshaped and expanded version of
Jeep's more popular Grand Cherokee model that
squeezes in a third-row-seat to match the
competition. While it isn't nearly as space
efficient as many competitors, it allows for
four passengers to sit in much more comfort than
in the smaller Grand Cherokee, and can fit two
more children. Like the Grand Cherokee, the
Commander rides and handles well for a
truck-based SUV, but lacks steering feel. A weak
and noisy 3.7-liter V6 is standard, and an
adequately powerful and quiet 4.7-liter V8 and a
smooth and a strong 5.7-liter V8 are optional,
but none of the three are fuel-efficient.
Visibility is poor in all directions, despite
the boxy shape, because of thick roof pillars
and a high beltline. The Commander is a decent
choice for consumers who must have a high towing
capacity or good off-road ability, but its
space, comfort, and refinement are not
comparable to a good car-based competitor's.
If you don't need
towing and off-road capabilities, consider the
GMC Acadia and
Saturn Outlook twins, which are spacious,
comfortable, and refined. Another
excellent midsize SUV to consider is the Ford
Taurus X, which is quiet but otherwise
un-luxurious, but is well-priced, comfortable,
safe, and spacious, though it doesn't have quite
as much cargo space as the Acadia. The Hyundai Veracruz has a luxurious interior and a very
quiet ride, and is roomy and comfortable, but
isn't as agile or spacious as the Acadia, and
lacks a price advantage. The Honda Pilot is a
roomy, somewhat utilitarian SUV that lacks the
Acadia's luxury but is all-around competent. The
Mazda CX-9 is the class leader for consumers
interested in nimble handling, and the Chrysler
Pacifica is a good value alternative, but
neither are as roomy as the Acadia. And, for
those willing to consider them, minivans are
excellent alternatives to FWD car-based midsize
SUVs. If towing or off-road ability is a must,
consider the Ford Explorer and Nissan
Pathfinder. The Explorer is more spacious,
refined, and comfortable than either the
Pathfinder or the Commander, but the other two
are more powerful. The Pathfinder handles better
and gets better gas mileage, but isn't as roomy.
For even more space, consider larger SUVs like the Dodge Durango
(which is mechanically related to the Commander
but much roomier) and the Ford
Expedition.
|
|
|
|
Jeep Grand
Cherokee

Available As: Midsize SUV
Base
Price Range (MSRP): $27,665-$40,105
Pros:
Acceleration (5.7-liter), ride, handling,
towing capacity.
Cons:
Interior space, fuel economy, visibility,
interior quality, refinement (V6), acceleration
(V6.)
Overall: With a well-designed interior, it
could have been one of the best truck-based
midsize SUVs. Without it, it isn't.
Rating:
5/10
Recommended: NO
|
Characteristic: |
Compared to Midsize SUVs |
Compared to All Vehicles |
|
Seat
Comfort |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Luxury |
4/10 |
5/10 |
|
Practicality |
3/10 |
6/10 |
|
Performance |
6/10 |
5/10 |
|
Fuel
Economy |
3/10 |
2/10 |
|
Safety |
5/10 |
6/10 |
|
Price |
7/10 |
4/10 |
|
The
Grand Cherokee is available with a smooth,
strong 5.7-liter V8, rides and handles well for
a truck-based SUV, and seems to do better
off-road even than many other truck-based
competitors. But its shortcomings make it a poor
choice in its class, shortcomings that are
mostly found inside. The front seats lack head
room, the low rear seat is uncomfortable and
lacks leg room, there is no available third-row
seat, and cargo space and access is compromised
by the high load floor. The interior is also
shoddily assembled with too many cheap plastics.
Furthermore, the base V6 engine is weak and
noisy, the midline 4.7-liter V8 isn't as strong
as many competitors', and none of the three
engines gets good gas mileage. The Grand
Cherokee has its strong points, but then too
many negatives.
Two better choices
than the Grand Cherokee are the mechanically
related Dodge Durango and Jeep Commander. Both
offer comfortable seating for four passengers
(the Durango goes further with space for eight
to sit in comfort) and share the Grand
Cherokee's strong points, but also suffer from
mediocre interior quality, poor gas mileage, and
weak base engines, and are larger and more
expensive. If you want something the size of the
Grand Cherokee and need to tow or go off-road,
consider the Ford Explorer and Nissan
Pathfinder. The Pathfinder is more powerful and
agile, and the Explorer is more spacious and
quieter. For on-road use and no need for a
third-row, consider the Nissan Murano and
Mitsubishi Endeavor, which offer comfort for
five passengers and good acceleration and
handling. And for more space at around the same
price, consider the Chrysler Pacifica and Ford
Taurus X, which are spacious, safe, comfortable,
and quiet.
|
|
|
Last Update: 1/21/08 |
|
|
|